Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Resolution 590-99 <br /> August 18, 1999 <br /> Page 2 <br /> 1. Relationship with the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> The Comprehensive Plan encourages the development and maintenance of residential <br /> areas so as to improve the quality, appearance and attractiveness of housing units and <br /> residential property in general. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property, 2809 <br /> Woodale Drive, as high-density residential. The existing use is not compatible with the <br /> land use designation,yet this will be corrected with the updated comprehensive plan. <br /> Garages and other types of accessory structures--like sheds and tool buildings--are <br /> allowed and even expected in this district,yet a garage that is triple the size of the house <br /> would be inconsistent with the second residential goal, which states: "Preserve the identity <br /> and improve the quality and appearance of residential neighborhoods. " Allowing a <br /> garage that is three times as large as the house would create an obtrusive structural <br /> imbalance and could likely detract from the aesthetic appearances of the neighborhood <br /> This proposal does conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> 2. The Geographical Area Involved. <br /> 4. The Character of the Surrounding Area <br /> In this area of Mounds View, most of the lots are as large or larger than the subject <br /> property. There is a good mix of architecture present in the neighborhood, with some of <br /> the houses being older and some newer. The subject home, however, is significantly <br /> smaller than those in the immediate area. While many homes in this area have large <br /> garages, they do not appear out of place because the houses are larger as well. While a • <br /> larger garage could be physically accommodated on the subject property, it would not be <br /> proportionally consistent with the house. <br /> 3. Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. <br /> It can be generally assumed that adding to the existing garage would have a positive <br /> impact on the value of the subject property. It is not known whether a garage three times <br /> larger than the home would have a negative monetary impact upon the neighborhood, even <br /> though it may be physically obtrusive. <br /> 5. The demolish cited i►eed fur such a use. <br /> The existing garage--at 720 square feet-- is considered fairly typical by today's standards. <br /> While it does not have access for three vehicles, there is ample work area and supplemental <br /> storage space beyond that space needed for the vehicles. However with multi-car families <br /> being the norm rather than the exception, demonstrating the need for additional garage space <br /> becomes less of an issue. <br /> WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission finds that the general criteria of <br /> approval for conditional use permits, as stated in Section 1125.01 Subdivision 3.b. of the Mounds <br /> View Zoning Code, can not fully be satisfied. These criteria and responses are as follows: <br /> 1. The use will not create an excessive burden on existing parks, schools, streets and other • <br /> public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. <br /> 7. The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. <br />