Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br /> • Meeting Date: September 1, 1999 <br /> Staff Report by: James Ericson, Planning Associate <br /> Planning Case No.: 568-99 <br /> Request: The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a 44-foot wide <br /> driveway, nine feet wider than what the Code allows. <br /> Applicant: John Henning <br /> Location: 8359 Red Oak Drive <br /> PIN No. 06-30-23-12-0100 <br /> Zoning/Land Use: R-1, Single Family Residential/ Single Family Dwelling <br /> Applicable Regulations: <br /> • Section 1104.01, Subdivision 4c(1)(a) states that no driveway shall exceed a width <br /> of thirty five feet. <br /> • Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 lists the criteria for granting a variance. <br /> • Attachments: Planning Application <br /> Zoning Map <br /> Site Plan <br /> Letter from resident, dated 8/11/99 <br /> Letter from affected neighbor at 8365 Red Oak Drive, dated 8/2/99 <br /> Resolution 593-99 <br /> Background: <br /> The applicant, John Henning, s req c d hat the-Planning Commission approve a variance for a <br /> driveway nine feet wider than is allowed by Code. The maximum width for a driveway is 35 feet. <br /> The applicant wishes to add a nine-foot wide parking pad alongside the garage, which to provide <br /> access for, causes the driveway to increase to a width of 44 feet. The driveway, however, narrows <br /> to 14 feet as it approaches the street. <br /> The intent of the Code requirement which limits how wide a driveway can be is in part to prevent <br /> an excessive amount of impervious surface on a property. As stated above, the limit is not <br /> arbitrary, instead it is derived from the width of a three car garage. <br /> Analysis: <br /> • The applicant in this case was not aware of the limitation for driveway widths and had graded the <br /> lot and constructed a retaining wall at the property line to accommodate such a driveway. The <br /> adjacent property owner, Norbert Moe, has signed a statement(attached) indicating that he <br />