My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-15-1999
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
09-15-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 11:06:40 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 11:06:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/15/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission September 1, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 8 <br /> • <br /> to Review the City Code in Regard to the Driveway Requirements and Possible Amendments, and <br /> Bring the Matter Forward to the Planning Commission at a Future Meeting. <br /> Ayes– 8 Nays–0 The motion carried. <br /> Commissioner Kaden inquired if the trees had not been present, would the aicantave constructed <br /> a 35-foot wide driveway to the property line. Mr. Henning stated he would been very satisfied <br /> to have a 35-foot wide driveway to the street, and the tree = ere the resort° 't lis design, whi .. <br /> does restrict the size of his driveway considerably. Commissioner KadenloattlitheKaden did not lie <br /> m t in whic ;:> e mit">< =F<<: :>t; • yved <br /> to see the occurrence, common within new develop enl< ,, h..;:e ry t�,tl`�_ � :.,��,�x�;...;;- <br /> from the site. <br /> It*, .. ��'1st <#x <br /> M ) h4 <br /> view <br /> Commissioner Miller noted another issue to be considered was'that the City Code had been amended <br /> to allow driveways to be closer than five feet from the prpgettYkkAggiiiftstatedproperty this was not always <br /> the case. > «< <br /> New <br /> 6. Staff Reports /Items of Informati(, : %zF_' <br /> A. Discussion concerningthan a t<i,locatio ` of'`screen fence at the Anthony <br /> Properties/O'Neil pat :r Pro ect <br /> Community Development Direct0,6pke statedrthis item was to discuss the potential change in the <br /> fence locat': at the Anthony t 'roperties•Neil` ` ':€eater Project. He stated there was much <br /> discussio :v a .:vg the big011grkthe development from the adjacent residential properties located <br /> across '0/ ; : i . ki H-2.1%gf#4.0s part of the approved plan, there were provisions requiring <br /> a 50-foot wiote,vgAtio,well asly..=-fo >=mood screen fence, in addition to the three office buildings <br /> which were to bOTOcted aloh ` fsouth side. <br /> Jopke st <. <� the fence 't #e...located at the 50-foot buffer line, and the plan that was approved <br /> hr" ''`fTice buildings-to ti-nuous scrcenin -wall—Hc stat-ed <br /> indicat :<stilt <br /> fence coi�neele{l�lix � g <br /> the •`12:Veloper construct ; a:> ntinuous screen fence in that area, prior to the construction of the <br /> o' ;t:3Y.uildings, as this was a phased development. He stated that the developer has indicated they <br /> . 17.; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.