Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission September 1, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting - Page 21 <br /> • <br /> Jopke stated that staff would review the minutes to define what the location of the fence was, and <br /> should be, and report back to the Planning Commission. He inquired if the Commission would direct <br /> staff to notify the residents of a public hearing. <br /> Commissioner Johnson stated he would like the City Attorney to review the matter to determine if <br /> it legally necessary to have that meeting. He stated Mr. Smith was to , pef developer who <br /> attempted to cooperate with the neighbors, and if he is not required to co i a i through the entire <br /> process, he should not have to. :' >.;> , <br /> "Jopke stated staff would contact the City Attorneys office ,4.01g'quirgiiiiikpRifilthe <br /> Commission would like to notify the neighbors. Commissioner Stevenson state .e d :nrt know <br /> where the Planning Commission's involvement in this mattrEIe stated, if they desired a public <br /> forum,he did not see where the Planning Commission should 5" ter involved in the process. He <br /> stated he was not saying there shouldn't be a public forum, ho e111he.did not think it should be <br /> held at the Planning Commission level. 'k' > ` >''»>-«<4 <br /> a£�:::.:» <:<��:.<::<:€: <br /> Chairperson Peterson stated if the CityAttorneyoamirigIthe samiriiiiidUsion as the Planning <br /> Commission, in that there was no requirement o"loc.a The f ce.behix d`the building, which would <br /> cause it to encroach into the buffer, there Mild be n 'ssu '" t"`e:`vires the Planning Commission. <br /> He stated, however, there was an expectation in the riinds ofxt >people that this level of research <br /> should occur at the Planning Commiss o 'level, t . r'efore, he° ould assume the public forum would <br /> • �' AV <br /> be best held at this level. : " r <br /> IV mak <br /> Commission..: 'ller stated theaap licant hada a.ed.tl e ywould move the fence six feet, and inquired <br /> if that wo.-:ldx: ;ace it into the b er. Mr. Sii itl'<£Sta�ed it would be six feet into the buffer, and. . 1. u <�r. they <br /> would to e m al shrubberyi >$tl e buffer area. Jopke stated it would impact the existing <br /> landscaping a fd ery utile, i `A <br /> VFWCommissioner;4016 : a etl;:the Cit•<�ou cil would have to amend the Planned Unit Development <br /> documen. 'the fenceaed into the buffer. Commissioner Stevenson stated this would not <br /> be req.„...,....--:' <br /> eq ' : if the fence` . s<i i � ti d between the bui tgs. <br /> Jo.:: ' stated staff would' report back to the Planning Commission with the results of their <br /> i.i`:e tigation, and the Planning Commission could, at that point, determine what was correct, in <br /> r,e,...<` .°to the process,and pass that recommendation on to the City Council. <br /> C ' .'::':s3.y1,,,,akepoche stated the ordinance should also be reviewed to determine the process required <br /> for latifidliiiit Developments, in cases of modifications. He stated in his opinion, everything should <br /> be brought forward for the benefit of the residents. He stated there should be no variance rights given <br /> to the developer without the notification and input of the residents. <br /> Chairperson Peterson stated that only in very minor instances such as the relocation of a sidewalk <br /> IIIshould the entire process not be required, however, a matter regarding a fence, or things of that <br />