Laserfiche WebLink
s <br /> Planning Case No. 571-99 <br /> Doroff Shed CUP <br /> October 6, 1999 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Analysis: <br /> Dimensional Requirements: <br /> Required Proposed Met? <br /> Shed Setbacks (Side) 5 feet 6 feet Met <br /> (Rear) 5 feet - 35 feet Met <br /> Percent of Rear Yard <20% 6% Met <br /> Total Area of Accessory Buildings: s 1,400 sf. 384 sf. (shed) Met <br /> 480 sf. (garage) <br /> 864 sf. (Total) <br /> CUP requirements: <br /> Section 1106.04 of the Zoning Code states that no accessory building other than a garage shall <br /> exceed 216 square feet except by conditional use permit. With a conditional use permit, the <br /> maximum area for a shed is 400 square feet and for all accessory buildings the maximum area is a <br /> combined 1,400 square feet. As with any conditional use permit application, the Planning <br /> Commission needs to examine the possible adverse effects of the proposed use and review the <br /> general CUP criteria and specific CUP requirements, if any are listed. <br /> 11 <br /> Section 1125.01, Subdivision 1e lists the general adverse effects criteria which need to be <br /> addressed in order for a conditional use permit to be approved. These criteria are as follows: <br /> 1. Relationship with the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> The Comprehensive Plan encourages the development and maintenance of residential areas <br /> so as to improve the quality, appearance and attractiveness of housing units and residential <br /> property in general. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property, 8270 Eastwood <br /> Roadlow-density residential. This pi opo al does-not-conflict with-the-Comprehensive <br /> Plan. <br /> 2. The Geographical Area Involved <br /> 4. The Character of the Surrounding Area <br /> Almost every lot in this area of Mounds View is the same size as the subject property. <br /> Many of the homes in the immediate area have a similar split-entry design and have attached <br /> two-car garages. Many of the homes have sheds in addition to their garages. <br /> 3. Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed <br /> It is not believed that the construction of the shed, even one so large as is proposed by the <br /> applicants, would depreciate the neighborhood. The shed would be completely screened <br /> except for the peak, which might be visible from the adjacent properties. The shed would <br />