Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Resolution 595-99 <br /> October 6, 1999 <br /> Page 2 <br /> 4. The Character of the Surrounding Area <br /> Almost every lot in this area of Mounds View is the same size as the subject property. Many <br /> of the homes in the immediate area have a similar split-entry design and have attached two-car <br /> garages. Many of the homes have sheds in addition to their garages. <br /> 3. Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed <br /> It is not believed that the construction of the shed, even one so large as is proposed by the <br /> applicants, would depreciate the neighborhood. The shed would be completely screened <br /> except for the peak, which might be visible from the adjacent properties. The shed would <br /> allow the applicants to store all of their pool equipment, yard equipment and other common <br /> items in one structure without taking away any room in the garage. <br /> 5. The demonstrated need for such a use. <br /> The existing garage is a small, two-car garage of only 480 square feet. While expanding the <br /> garage to the rear is feasible, this option would take up well-utilized backyard space next to the <br /> home. The applicants desire to construct the shed behind the pool in a less-used part of the <br /> yard to minimize the impact of adding 384 square-feet of accessory building space. <br /> WHEREAS, the Planning Commission makes the following findings regarding the general <br /> criteria for approval of a conditional use permit, as required by Section 1125.01 Subd. 3.b.: <br /> (1) The use will not create an excessive burden on existing parks, schools, streets and <br /> other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. <br /> (7) The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. <br /> (8) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and necessary facilities have been or will <br /> be provided <br /> The-addition-af-a-storage-shed,—even hat-proposed- would-not-create a <br /> greater impact on existing public facilities or services, on utilities or access roads, nor would <br /> it create an increase in traffic on adjacent streets. <br /> (2) The use will be sufficiently compatible or separated by distance or screening from <br /> adjacent residentially zoned or used land so that existing homes will not be <br /> depreciated in value and there will be no deterrence to development of vacant land <br /> (3) The structure and site shall have an appearance that will not have an adverse effect <br /> upon adjacent residential properties. <br /> The location of the shed behind the home and garage would hide it from general public <br /> view. Because of the tall fence surrounding the backyard area, the shed itself would be <br /> AI screened even from the adjoining properties as well. The shed would have a barn-like <br /> design, similar to one on an adjacent property, and would neither be incompatible with nor <br /> detrimental to this district. <br />