Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission September 15, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> III the other side, and it would be very unlikely to fill this area with enough water to reach the top of the <br /> hill at the rear of the property. Ericson added there would be 55 feet between the rear of the <br /> proposed garage and the property line. <br /> Chairperson Peterson inquired if there were tax consequences for combining two paxcels. Ericson <br /> stated he believed that there were, and this would result in tax savings to thptperty owner. <br /> Commissioner Johnson stated this was correct, and would benefit the pr ,y svner. <br /> Commissioner Stevenson noted the four-foot varianceuest wasps'%esently before t <br /> Commission for action. Ericson stated this was correct, as st 'was not a>'°ares "':,: oment :that <br /> the lot combination would not be a viable alternative. ..::: 4110021 ,....:,.411ip,„ <br /> ;,:&,,,,. ogv <br /> Commissioner Stevenson inquired if the matter should beth tabled. Ericson stated this could <br /> be done, however, staff onlyrequired direction re ardin ' 'a a :.`_` <br /> q g ga $ �f resolution the Commission <br /> would like staff to draft. He explained if the Planning Commissionfinds is sufficient hardship, <br /> staff will draft a resolution of approval, and if not, a resolution denyin oom*rest for variance would <br /> be prepared. :,;' 'l 4.:.. ' <br /> APV.WWI <br /> Commissioner Miller commented she would like to si et_l atter o forward. Commissioner <br /> glightn' ` : +the awards presented to Mr. <br /> Johnson agreed. He added, in of Mr.,,� ' enstei r� fcoi': :.y.„ N <br /> Johnson by the Economic Developmentcommission`for his e diiikwith the fourplexes, he believed <br /> $ the applicant deserves this. Ai <br /> £"� <br /> 441 <br /> Chairperson Peterson commented e improvements Mz-��##`ohnson has made are good, and he believed <br /> the propos. s appropria: n.noted theE *minimal disruption or negative impact with <br /> this pro ;.`.sa,;;.;,��d, as to .' :. s th >;Fire Code>i q irements are met, this was a very good plan. <br /> Commis : t: en stated h i ed this as an improvement as well, as long as the Fire Code <br /> requirements ' _'' =<< < :<« <br /> :-,::"..:„,,,„,, <br /> Commissier< n " a <br /> ziqtir <br /> ctpiti e matterof the fence between the two-foot section of the buildings. <br /> Ericson s d this stjlatld be added to the resolution. <br /> Or 4 <br /> MQ< iN/SECOND: Be :Ff. /Jonson. To Direct Staff to Prepare a Resolution Approving a Four-Foot <br /> VA ce Request to AMCfor a Zero-foot Setback to Construct a Six-stall Garage to Service two <br /> Fg -slexes at 2075 &2081 Hillview Road, Stipulating that a Fence be Constructed Between the <br /> VitgA. es for Secu t'Purposes. <br /> Ayes— 8 Nays—0 Motion carried. <br /> 6. Planning Case No. 569-99 <br /> Property Involved: 8011 Sunnyside Road <br />