Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission September 15, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 13 <br /> Land Use Plan, which sets an overall tone for land use, however, there are other individual sections <br /> that the Council looks to, regarding specific projects and ways to implement them. <br /> Commissioner Berke inquired if this was s Community Development Director Jopke's experience with <br /> other cities. Community Development Director Jopke stated it was, however, this did snot mean that <br /> the issue did not merit clarification. <br /> Commissioner Stevenson stated the way that it is presente the C `' <br /> in : j : nsive Plan, and the <br /> information it contains, he did not see where this document>N:•akes an'': statement that econo <br /> ;.- <br /> development =1:x z: :<>: .; <br /> has any priority. A <br /> Economic Development Coordinator Carroll stated the Ec 0elopment CorilaSihad not <br /> intended the document to appear this way. He explained thefna t amprehensive Plan ''pdate would <br /> address many different issues, adding that if it makes ref rei 't honstructing a water tower or <br /> improving a park, this would not imply that this should tatcf.pril410140ball other things. He stated <br /> the fact that the Economic Development Commission has a sectionjd e s not imply that it takes <br /> priority. He noted it is for the City Council and theAgt*DevelopOSVAilkhoritythe to decide how <br /> the money is allocated. He reiterated this document . ' t : `ell as a gei1'guide in regard to what <br /> the Economic Development Commission beliefs should b `t c ne. -Ie pminted out the document will <br /> be submitted to the Economic Development< uthorit ..£and tht geabbncil for review, and they may <br /> decide to change it, however, the Economic Deelopmencmmission has done its part as an <br /> II advisory body. ` <br /> AP 4 IV <br /> 41% <br /> • <br /> Commissioner Miller stated she quite.4pressed=tth the document. She stated it was not <br /> lengthy, {`:.; A:�..� k` 3y?:?.,.. ���' . <br /> .tea. >�. k. �;���� :: <br /> ho Fryer, it contains ; ;ch infor "o:'�Y t'r`>:. <br /> Commutif V:illgptORment Director J ke stated that the Economic Development Commission <br /> and <br /> Kevin Caro 1 ejh.a very° ; d.>.. �:>:r� preparing this document and commended them on their <br /> k <br /> efforts. : '::::.? <br /> zr*Faaltita . 'kW" <br /> ChairpersonPeterson St to t it .s a ve .00d and concise statement of what needed to be done <br /> and sh'uld be viewed in the ntext of the whole Comprehensive Plan. He added that further <br /> refer'::n ting of the reside tiaj issues contained within the document would clarify the issue of <br /> ri:0;::ntial developmentconomic Development Coordinator Carroll stated that there could be <br /> i!:.'''' .1 cross-reference. to the residential development issues within the document. <br /> it .: n.....'eters.n stated that certain areas within the City will need assistance in terms of <br /> r=� . °. , . and this document provides some good guidelines for helping that along. <br /> C. Previous Council Actions <br /> Community Director Jopke reported on previous Council action from their meeting on September <br /> II 13. He stated the Council held First Reading of Ordinance 639, which pertains to conditional <br /> uses within the R-4 and R-5 Zoning Districts. He noted there was approval of a Wetland Buffer <br />