My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/09/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/09/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:11 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 12:29:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/26/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/26/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
210
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council August 22, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br />a developer would install improvements and not be paid interest. He stated that a 5% interest 1 <br />rate is probably 250 basis points lower than the current average lending rate. Most are at 650-2 <br />675 so 5% is a lower interest rate by market standard. He stated he can provide many examples, 3 <br />if requested by the Council, but does not have them with him this evening. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Ms. Haake stated Medtronic has agreed to pay $9.65 million for the Bridges and asked why $1 6 <br />million of the purchase cost is relabeled as reimbursement by Medtronic, in place of sale price, 7 <br />which in effect lowers the park dedication fee by $100,000. It also places $150,000 back on 8 <br />trails that they get to use. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Mayor Marty stated he also has that question. 11 <br /> 12 <br />City Administrator Ulrich explained the $865,000 is based on what Medtronic is paying the City 13 <br />of Mounds View for the property. Part of the negotiations is that a portion of the park dedication 14 <br />($150,000) would be used to improve the adjacent land for public use that would also be 15 <br />available to SYSCO and Medtronic employees as well as the public. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Ms. Haake stated the legislation indicated that the $1 million was to be paid in the revertor clause 18 <br />and paid for by the City of Mounds View. She asked if Medtronic is paying $9.6 million, then 19 <br />why is the City not getting another $100,000 from them. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Dan Hall, 2200 Highway 10, stated he was one of the first people who wants to keep things civil 22 <br />because all are interested in what is best for the citizens of Mounds View. He stated he would 23 <br />not like to be told over the last two months that he was not looking out for what is best for 24 <br />Mounds View and was being duped and taken advantage of by Medtronic. Mr. Hall noted this 25 <br />type of comment is coming from the “nice side” but he does not see the same tactics being used 26 <br />by the proponents who want to sell the golf course to someone to make it profitable. He stated it 27 <br />is his belief that Mr. McCarty, Ms. Haake, and Mr. Amundsen want to stall it long enough so 28 <br />Medtronic will go to another city. He stated it is evident to him that they are “grasping at 29 <br />straws.” He stated when you accuse people of dealing under the table and taking bribes, how can 30 <br />you expect a civil conversation and work going back and forth. He stated he agrees with the 31 <br />majority of the Council that due diligence has been done and the Council has done a good job. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Cindy Sobasik, 2146 Hillview Road, stated she believes that moving forward puts the residents 34 <br />of Mounds View at risk for unwarranted and unwelcomed liability and it astounds her to think 35 <br />that residents could be priced out of their homes. She stated that Bethlehem Baptist Church 36 <br />made a $25,000 donation in place of tax money generated since it is in a TIF district. SYSCO, 37 <br />who provides more jobs to residents, took a small TIF and it will be repaid in two years, which to 38 <br />her seems reasonable. However, she is concerned with subsidizing a multi-million dollar 39 <br />company that can afford to pay taxes and should be demonstrating good corporate citizenship, 40 <br />which includes paying its fair share. Ms. Sobasik asked for a fair deal or no deal. She asked the 41 <br />Council if they saw, read, and understood the contract related to redeveloping the golf course into 42 <br />a Medtronic facility prior to voting on it. 43 <br /> 44
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.