Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council August 22, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br /> <br />two of her colleagues about the interest question and both indicated that they did not recall that 1 <br />New Brighton included interest payments in their TIF Districts. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Dennis Hammes, 5511 Quincy, stated he spoke at the Town Hall meeting and while he is not 4 <br />“for” or “against” Medtronic, he is having a hard time considering a 25-year TIF district. He 5 <br />stated it does not seem right, is too high, and he does not think Medtronic really needs it. Mr. 6 <br />Hammes stated when he collected signatures for the petition, he said this is something the 7 <br />residents need to vote on, and did not make statements against Medtronic. He stated this should 8 <br />be a decision for the residents of Mounds View and not five people because it is too much of a 9 <br />burden for five people. He stated the entire community should be involved. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Connie Hammes, 5511 Quincy, pointed out that only Phase 1 is guaranteed in the draft purchase 12 <br />agreement and contract. Phases 2 and 3 show tentative starting dates of 2012 and 2017. Full 13 <br />development is optional and dependent upon future financial assistance for Phases 2 and 3. She 14 <br />asked if both Phases 2 and 3 occur by additional future subsidies, what are the projections 15 <br />concerning TIF as a percentage of the City’s future tax capacity. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Director Ericson stated staff has not considered those numbers because there are too many 18 <br />variables to even guess what will happen in 10 to 15 years. He stated at this point he does not 19 <br />know what the property values will be or the impact to the City. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Ms. Hammes noted that Medtronic indicates no part of the purchase is for speculation or land 22 <br />holding. The draft contract is relevant only to Phase 1. There is no enforceable obligation 23 <br />regarding sale or assignment for Phases 2 and 3. She asked if the Council has considered 24 <br />subdividing Phase 1 construction, holding any balance of the Bridges property as a public asset, 25 <br />contingent upon Medtronic’s first right of refusal for future development phases. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Councilmember Thomas explained that Phases 2 and 3, as far as projected development, is going 28 <br />up, not out, so it would have the same footprint. Because of that, there is no way to subdivide 29 <br />out properties for future phases. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Mayor Marty stated it was his understanding that Medtronic wanted the whole deal. 32 <br /> 33 <br />City Attorney Riggs stated it is difficult to deal with “what ifs” down the road. This 34 <br />development contract deals with Phase 1 construction of approximately an 8,200 square foot 35 <br />footprint of development. The contract defines the development property and the EDA has to 36 <br />consent to any assignments or sales so the City does have that control right now. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Joan Dofney, 7801 Gloria Circle, stated this is the second year that City Administrator Ulrich has 39 <br />worked in Mounds View. She asked City staff if they live in Mounds View. All staff members 40 <br />present indicated they do not. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Ms. Dofney asked if any of the Medtronic representatives in attendance live in Mounds View. 43 <br />She stated the Council has been voted in to represent her and those who signed the petition. She 44 <br />stated all would agree this is a large multi-million dollar deal with a health provider for people 45