Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council August 22, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 16 <br /> <br />7. JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS 1 <br /> 2 <br />This Agenda Item was considered after Agenda Item 8, Council Business. 3 <br /> 4 <br />8. COUNCIL BUSINESS 5 <br /> 6 <br />A. 7:05 p.m.: Public Hearing and Consideration of Resolution 6590 Approving a 7 <br />PUD Amendment for SYSCO Minnesota to Expand Their Facility at 2400 8 <br />Co. Road J 9 <br /> 10 <br />B. 7:10 p.m.: Public Hearing and Consideration of Resolution 6591 Approving 11 <br />the Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the SYSCO Minnesota Facility 12 <br />Expansion 13 <br /> 14 <br />Mayor Marty opened the public hearing at 10:08 p.m. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained that the project was approved in 1989 and, 17 <br />at that time, Outlot A of 46 acres was passed to the City for open space and envisioned for trails 18 <br />or public amenity. A small triangle of land was used to develop the golf course. SYSCO is now 19 <br />asking for 3 acres back to allow for 100 new employees to be added to their workforce, the 20 <br />addition of 100 vehicle parking stalls, 50 truck parking stalls, incorporate the relocation of a 21 <br />drive access from County Road J, and provide greater maneuverability for trucks. He explained 22 <br />that the SYSCO project is a PUD approved in 1989 for the use it is currently operating. No 23 <br />change in land use is being proposed. It will remain as a food distribution company. Director 24 <br />Ericson advised that SYSCO is currently short on vehicle and truck parking areas. The 25 <br />additional area allows for parking a truck once instead of moving one out to bring in another. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Director Ericson advised that in addition, a Comprehensive Plan amendment is needed since it is 28 <br />a passive open area and SYSCO is guided as a Heavy Industrial use. He explained that by 29 <br />attaching that 3 acre sliver of property to the SYSCO property, it makes sense to rezone it to 30 <br />Heavy Industrial. The Planning Commission reviewed the request, recommends approval, and 31 <br />found that the Comprehensive Plan amendment would be consistent. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Director Ericson stated the City is the adjacent property owner and staff believes there would be 34 <br />no adverse effects. The property in question is currently tax exempt and this would bring it back 35 <br />onto the tax rolls and allow SYSCO to maintain its operation in Mounds View. The 36 <br />Comprehensive Plan land use amendment vacation will be sent to the Metropolitan Council and 37 <br />adjoining property owners. Director Ericson recapped that staff and the Planning Commission 38 <br />believe the Comprehensive Plan amendment should be approved and will help SYSCO address 39 <br />their future and current needs as a business. He noted there are two draft resolutions for the 40 <br />Council’s consideration and that representatives of SYSCO are in attendance to answer questions 41 <br />the Council may have. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Phil Seipp, President of SYSCO Minnesota, stated he would be happy to answer questions of the 44 <br />Council or audience. 45