My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/09/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/09/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:11 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 12:29:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/26/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/26/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
210
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council August 22, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 22 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />An audience member asked about the locations of the phases. Director Ericson used a site map 2 <br />to identify the location of the buildings in Phases 1, 2 and 3, the parking ramp, and surface 3 <br />parking areas. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Mr. McCarty asked if there will be additional business subsidies for Phases 2 and 3. Director 6 <br />Ericson stated the business subsidies being considered relate to Phase 1. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Mr. McCarty asked if it is a “given” and that opportunity is preserved to allow for additional 9 <br />business subsidies for future phases. Director Ericson stated the contract under consideration 10 <br />relates only to Phase 1 and does not tie this or future Councils to subsequent TIF or subsidy for 11 <br />this project. 12 <br /> 13 <br />City Attorney Riggs explained the current contract only covers Phase 1 and the financing for 14 <br />Phase 1. Any other financing request would have to stand on its own and be compliant with 15 <br />State law. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Mr. McCarty stated the current contract indicates that future subsidies will not be unreasonably 18 <br />withheld for Phases 2 and 3. He asked if this Council is signing the contract with that proviso 19 <br />included. 20 <br /> 21 <br />City Attorney Riggs stated the Council will not bind itself at this point in time and any request 22 <br />made would have to follow the same process with a public hearing and the but/for test would be 23 <br />implicated. He stated that is the general concept that is being considered. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Mr. McCarty asked if the commitments of this Council cannot be held to future Councils. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Mayor Marty stated if Phase 1 is approved and Medtronic comes in, then the City will want 28 <br />Phases 2 and 3 to also be constructed on Mounds View property to capture all the taxes 29 <br />potentially available at some date and time. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Mr. McCarty asked how that effects the decertification possibilities in the future if one business 32 <br />subsidy is being piling on top of another. Mayor Marty explained that they would not tie together 33 <br />and could run currently. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Mr. McCarty stated the 25 year term that citizens are being told of could be something much 36 <br />different. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Mayor Marty explained that Phase 1 stands on its own and when paid off, that District would be 39 <br />decertified. If they create Phase 2, that has the potential to stand on its own unless they do 40 <br />Phases 2 and 3 together. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Mr. McCarty stated the contract refers to additional future business subsidies and he believes that 43 <br />Medtronic will be back in 2012 saying they want another business subsidy, which means another 44 <br />TIF extension. 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.