Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council August 22, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 46 <br /> <br />in his opinion the Council’s action just “gutted the Charter.” 1 <br /> 2 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman stated the City has adopted ordinances from time 3 <br />to time when certain property has been conveyed from the City to the EDA. The City Attorney’s 4 <br />August 11, 2005 letter indicates that State law allows the City to convey property without regard 5 <br />to City Charter provisions. Minnesota State Statute 471.64 authorizes the City to enter into a 6 <br />contract for the sale of real property to another political subdivision without regard to Charter 7 <br />provisions. Although the City Council complied with the Charter and adopted an ordinance 8 <br />authorizing the conveyance, the Statute provides authority for the Council to adopt a resolution 9 <br />authorizing staff to finalize conveyance of the property to the EDA. Staff recommends the 10 <br />Council adopt the draft resolution which would convey the property known as the Bridges Golf 11 <br />Course to the Mounds View EDA. 12 <br /> 13 <br />MOTION/SECOND. Gunn/Stigney. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6581 14 <br />Authorizing Sale of City of Mounds View Property to the Mounds View Economic Development 15 <br />Authority 16 <br /> 17 <br />Mayor Marty stated his belief that taking this action is a blatant way to circumvent the Charter 18 <br />since the sale of land is to be done by ordinance. However, to pass a resolution conveying this 19 <br />property seems like over-kill or like someone is worried about this stopping and wanting to make 20 <br />sure residents don’t have the opportunity to vote. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Councilmember Gunn stated the EDA has handled all the land buying and selling and it has not 23 <br />been done through the Council. She stated this is no different. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated she was firmly against doing this by resolution because it needed 26 <br />to be done by ordinance. Now the Council has done it by ordinance so it is not circumventing 27 <br />anything. She stated this vote is the hardest thing she has ever had to do in her life. She stated 28 <br />she was very firm in conversations with staff that until that stand was made, this was off the 29 <br />table. Now this is a matter of paperwork, involves no change, or change in the process. She 30 <br />noted there have been discussions and the public has been dealt with in a way that was 31 <br />honorable. Councilmember Thomas reiterated that this is just paperwork. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Mayor Marty stated he begs to differ with the opinion that this is just paperwork. He noted it was 34 <br />petitioned and deemed invalid but why duplicate the process with a resolution just to ensure that 35 <br />all the bases are covered. He stated that seems to him to be over kill. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated it probably is and she does not know that it will serve any more 38 <br />benefit than action already taken but it is staff’s recommendation so she will support it. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated he agrees with Councilmember Thomas and does not want to 41 <br />leave any loopholes open that may delay this development. 42 <br /> 43 <br /> Ayes-4 Nay-1 (Marty) Motion carried. 44 <br /> 45