My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/10/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/10/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:29 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 12:35:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/10/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/10/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 25 <br /> <br />Councilmember Thomas stated if the City is to put out an expense, it is in maintaining control 1 <br />over the runoff and to then turn around, at some point, when it may be feasible to do single-2 <br />family. But, the Council is not going to be at that point until the development on County Road 3 <br />H2 is completed. She stated to protect the wetland is the value that could be discussed at this 4 <br />point as well as to have lower traffic numbers. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Councilmember Flaherty stated that is not an option unless it is looked at whether the City should 7 <br />consider making an offer. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated her suggestion is to discuss true cost at face value without 10 <br />considering a revenue after development. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Mayor Marty stated if the City starts talking to other developers about marketing, it may take too 13 <br />long and the trees could be bulldozed. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Councilmember Gunn asked if they are considering all or part of the land, or one of the ponds. 16 <br />She stated the Council also needs to discuss where the money would come from. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Mayor Marty stated it seems to him the cost will be too prohibitive. He noted the issues are 19 <br />wetlands, traffic safety, and adhering to the Comprehensive Plan on the eastern-most section. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated she thinks that 34 units will be cost prohibitive but is fine with 22 <br />talking about it. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Mayor Marty asked if the Council wants to hold a 10-minute executive session tonight following 25 <br />adjournment. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Councilmember Flaherty stated he does not know what the Council would even discuss. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Director Ericson stated he has consulted with Mr. Harstad who indicated he will not delay his 30 <br />development while the City explores projects with other developers or conducts studies. He 31 <br />advised that Mr. Harstad has indicated he is willing to consider an offer, if made, or he will move 32 <br />forward. 33 <br /> 34 <br />City Attorney Riggs stated the Council needs to state on the record the definition of the property 35 <br />being considered. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Councilmembers Flaherty, Gunn, and Thomas indicated a willingness to hold a 10 minute closed 38 <br />session to assess the acquisition opportunities associated with Harstad’s Red Oak Estates #3. 39 <br /> 40 <br />L. Resolution 6643 Disposal of Golf Course Memorial Items 41 <br /> 42 <br />Golf Course Manager Burg explained that a family came to the golf course and asked to receive 43 <br />back a tree they planted in memory of their loved one. She stated she returned the memorial 44 <br />plaque to them. The Japanese Lilac tree is next to Judicial Ditch #1 and will be within the 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.