My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/11/14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/11/14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:07 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 12:58:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/14/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/14/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council October 24, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 12 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Finance Director Beer stated he did not work on this audit but was aware of it. He stated when 2 <br />they met with the Appletree representative, he was asked if they had taken steps to address the 3 <br />State auditor’s report. He noted they no longer have the same consultant and are taking steps to 4 <br />be more competitive in their bidding process. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Mayor Marty stated if the Council approves going with the co-op, the City would have to take 7 <br />responsibility to follow the Board but if there are problems, the State Auditor already has a file 8 <br />on them. He asked if the City seeks bids during the time contracting with the co-op, would it 9 <br />justify them to kick out the City, 10 <br /> 11 <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that is correct. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Mayor Marty asked if the City can get kicked out if they register a complaint about the level of 14 <br />service. City Administrator Ulrich stated the members of the co-op have the right to register a 15 <br />complaint if the level of service is not being met without reprimand. He noted this group should 16 <br />not be allowed to represent themselves and should rely on member leadership. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Mayor Marty asked if the City should appoint someone to serve on the Board. City 19 <br />Administrator Ulrich answered in the affirmative. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Finance Director Beer noted the annual meeting is in August. He explained that if the City 22 <br />markets for bids and get kicked out, the City could go with BCBS, at a 4% increase. 23 <br /> 24 <br /> Ayes – 4 Nay – 1 (Marty) Motion carried. 25 <br /> 26 <br />I. Resolution 6653 Setting an Interest Rate and Administrative Fee for Special 27 <br />Assessments Certified During 2005 28 <br /> 29 <br />Finance Director Beer advised that certification of special assessment levies for delinquent utility 30 <br />bills and diseased trees will come up next month. These need to have a designated interest rate 31 <br />to be paid over the life of the assessment and a one time administrative fee to cover the initial 32 <br />cost of certifying the assessment. The assessments for 2004 was 5% and an administrative fee of 33 <br />$25 as established in Resolution 6354. Finance Director Beer advised this continues to be a fair 34 <br />rate and staff recommends that the interest rate on all special assessments in 2006 be set at 5.0% 35 <br />and an administrative fee of $25 per parcel. 36 <br /> 37 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Flaherty. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6653 Setting 38 <br />an Interest Rate and Administrative Fee for Special Assessments Certified During 2005. 39 <br /> 40 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 41 <br /> 42 <br /> J. Resolution 6667 Amending Proposal for Auction Services 43 <br /> 44
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.