My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/11/14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/11/14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:07 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 12:58:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/14/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/14/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council October 24, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 20 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Mayor Marty stated the income from the Chamber appeared to be relatively low. Finance 2 <br />Director Beer explained it is low but not when compared to the relatively small square footage 3 <br />they use. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Mayor Marty stated with the Sanitary Sewer Fund, the former Finance Director had mentioned 6 <br />last year to wait and see how it goes but it appears the rates set do not cover the cost. He stated 7 <br />he would like to address that issue during the budget process this year. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Finance Director Beer explained that the cost paid to the Metropolitan Environmental Services 10 <br />actually went down slightly for 2006 because the flow data caught up with the sump pumps. It 11 <br />went from a .4728% share down to .45047% of the total Environmental Services or a savings of 12 <br />about $16,000 to the City. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Councilmember Stigney requested staff provide a report on the cost for that whole project. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Councilmember Stigney questioned TIF District #3 being below the expected for the year. 17 <br />Finance Director Beer stated TIF District #1 is ahead and TIF District #2 is behind because of 18 <br />certifications. He thinks TIF District #3 is okay and there is nothing to cause alarm. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated his impression there was only one more payment and then it could 21 <br />be closed out so he was surprised to see the revenue was less than expected. Finance Director 22 <br />Beer stated he would have to research why that is occurring. 23 <br /> 24 <br />2. Budget 25 <br /> 26 <br />Mayor Marty suggested, because of time constraints, that the Council spend 20 minutes on this 27 <br />topic tonight and if there are additional concerns, Councilmembers can meet with staff at their 28 <br />convenience. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Council consensus was reached to discuss the budget for 15 minutes at tonight’s meeting. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Finance Director Beer suggested the Council address funds other than the General Fund. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Councilmember Stigney asked about special tax levies and operations of $76,000. Finance 35 <br />Director Beer stated one of the special tax levies relate to the additional police officer. He noted 36 <br />it has been in the budget since 2004. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Mayor Marty stated it does not show up in the budget summary until 2005. Finance Director 39 <br />Beer stated it may have been lumped into taxes. City Administrator Ulrich stated staff wanted to 40 <br />show it separately since it is a special levy and not subject to levy limits. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Mayor Marty asked about Cable TV part-time salaries and personnel costs that went from 43 <br />$17,000 to $25,573 for this year and $26,343 for next year. He stated that seems to be rapidly 44 <br />moving up and asked if it will start over when a new cable coordinator is hired. City 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.