My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/11/14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/11/14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:07 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 12:58:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/14/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/14/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council October 24, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 22 <br /> <br />Mayor Marty thanked staff for including $750,000 earmarked for Highway 10 redevelopment. 1 <br /> 2 <br />Councilmember Stigney asked if grants have been looked at for that highway corridor. Director 3 <br />Ericson advised that three grant requests were submitted and the City should receive an answer 4 <br />some time in January of 2006. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Mayor Marty questioned capital outlay, business subsidies, and partnership loans. Director 7 <br />Ericson explained the City has had this program since 1995 and it was adopted to provide for 8 <br />funding assistance for business if they meet certain criteria, some of which would be 9 <br />underwriting a loan or providing reduced interest on loans. He recalled the City doing that 10 <br />program twice. The City continues to offer that program to the community; however, at this 11 <br />point with low interest rates, not a lot of people are coming forward to request the subsidy. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Mayor Marty noted it is only budgeted for this year and next year and asked if this cost was 14 <br />located somewhere else in the budget for previous years. Director Ericson stated it may have 15 <br />shown up as a different line item but has been in the budget for years. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Councilmember Thomas noted the line item for training and conferences should show the new 18 <br />name of the agency. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Mayor Marty stated the Council will review the budget again at the next meeting. He suggested 21 <br />the Council’s questions be directed to staff. 22 <br /> 23 <br /> 3. Storm Damage Report 24 <br /> 25 <br />Public Works Director Lee distributed a report and cost estimates associated with the September 26 <br />storm. He stated all pickup was completed ten days ago. The total cost is estimated to be 27 <br />$95,750. Staff is currently working on the stump grinding estimate and for a contractor to do that 28 <br />service. Another item is park tree cleanup at Silverview Park where there are still 35 trees down, 29 <br />plus trees in other parks. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Public Works Director Lee stated trees that resulted in a hazard for people using the park were 32 <br />pulled aside with the aid of a skidster grappler attachment that was leased with the option to 33 <br />purchase. He advised that the cost to rent was $150 per day and the City had it for over 20 days 34 <br />so the cost of renting exceeds the purchase amount. He stated this is a great piece of equipment 35 <br />and will come back as a separate item since it was not budgeted and the cost is over $2,500. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Public Works Director Lee stated another line item is the cost of using City forces to clean up the 38 <br />storm debris. Public Works was assigned to properties north of Highway 10 and then moved to 39 <br />assist the contractors south of Highway 10. That cost estimate is not included but it means that 40 <br />City crews were not doing other fall activities. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Mayor Marty stated they may not have done other fall activities but did save the City a lot of 43 <br />money by not having to contract out more cleanup costs. 44 <br /> 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.