My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-28-2005 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
11-28-2005 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:18 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 1:00:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/28/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/28/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council November 14, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 11 <br /> <br />reflected on the final plat. Park dedication fees are $865,000 payable at the time of building 1 <br />permit application. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Director Ericson next addressed the second reading of the ordinance rezoning the CRM site from 4 <br />industrial to PUD. He advised that the usage of the property does not change; it is an office type 5 <br />use. The conversion to the PUD zoning designation offers flexibility and phased development. 6 <br />Director Ericson reported that the Planning Commission reviewed this and forwarded it to the 7 <br />City Council. They looked at the adverse effects based on the five criteria and found there 8 <br />appeared to be none with the rezoning. The Planning Commission and staff feel this is a worthy 9 <br />and supportable rezoning request, and it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 10 <br /> 11 <br />With regard to the vacation review, Director Ericson stated staff has prepared Ordinance 765 to 12 <br />vacate five different rights-of-way and easements. He noted the exhibit that identifies those 13 <br />individual areas with legal descriptions. Director Ericson explained that these are excess 14 <br />easements and rights-of-way platted in the 1940s with Laport Meadows and Jackson Drive, as it 15 <br />would have extended were Highway 10 not there. When Highway 10 came in, all easements to 16 <br />the north were cut off and became unusable. Director Ericson stated that the easements to be 17 <br />vacated are not needed. Needed easements will be rededicated with the final plat. 18 <br /> 19 <br />Mr. Ericson explained that the wetland area adjacent to the parking ramp and judicial ditch 20 <br />through the property will be relocated. The Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) has 21 <br />identified the ditch as wetland that needs to be mitigated. He noted the Pinnacle Engineering 22 <br />report, handouts, memos, and exhibits detailing the wetlands and area of mitigation. The RCWD 23 <br />authorized the storm water permit pending administrative responses so they do support this plan 24 <br />and recognize the on-site mitigation is the minimum to permit the development. Director 25 <br />Ericson noted the project area is well over 72 acres and to impact less than two acres is very 26 <br />beneficial. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Director Ericson pointed out that the large wetland area to the east is not being impacted at all 29 <br />and the City and RCWD are very appreciative of that. He stated that Resolution 6632 will 30 <br />approve the wetland alteration permit. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Director Ericson stated if the Council adopts the ordinance he would request that staff be 33 <br />authorized to publish a summary of the ordinance rather than five pages of maps and legal 34 <br />descriptions. He noted it will also be on the City’s website and publishing the summary will save 35 <br />several hundred dollars in publication costs. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Director Ericson noted that representatives from Medtronic and OPUS Architect and Engineering 38 <br />are in attendance tonight. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Councilmember Thomas asked if there are any changes in the two ordinance since first reading 41 <br />was approved. Director Ericson stated there were no changes to the ordinances since the first 42 <br />reading. 43 <br /> 44
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.