My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2004/01/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
Agenda Packets - 2004/01/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:06 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 1:58:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
1/26/2004
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
1/26/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
321
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council January 12, 2004 <br />Regular Meeting Page 8 <br /> <br />yellow on the map. The areas shaded in blue would be areas that would be mitigated to address 1 <br />the areas that are filled. He then indicated that the application has not been reviewed by Rice 2 <br />Creek Watershed District but it meets the basic requirements. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Director Ericson indicated there has been a lot of citizen and resident feedback on this matter. 5 <br />He then handed out another letter from a resident concerning the subdivision and said that 6 <br />residents are concerned about the hydrology and nature and trees as well as the setting but the 7 <br />biggest issue is the hydrology. He then said that there would need to be significant fill on the site 8 <br />for the house pads as there are a lot of organic soils and explained that one of the stipulations of 9 <br />any approval would be the requirement of a soil analysis and soil borings. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Director Ericson indicated that this plan does satisfy the City’s Comprehensive Plan although 12 <br />there is a clause that any subdivision of land needs to take into consideration the environmental 13 <br />aspects of the property. He then read the list of requirements that would need to be conditions of 14 <br />approval emphasizing that the applicant would not be allowed to allow any additional run off 15 <br />downstream from his property when homes are built and cannot affect the neighboring 16 <br />properties. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Director Ericson indicated that easements would need to be dedicated on this property and a park 19 <br />dedication fee would need to be paid. He then said that the assessed value of this property is 20 <br />substantially less than what Staff feels would be an appropriate value Staff recommends that an 21 <br />appraisal be done. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Director Ericson indicated that traffic issues are also a concern of residents but the roads were 24 <br />designed to anticipate development in the area. This development would create more traffic in 25 <br />the area but the road is designed to handle it. He then said that Staff is concerned with allowing 26 <br />driveways with direct access onto Silver Lake Road so one condition of approval would be that 27 <br />all driveways along Silver Lake Road would have to have a “T” to allow room to back out and 28 <br />turn around so the vehicles could pull out onto Silver Lake Road going forward to minimize the 29 <br />danger. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Director Ericson indicated that the property is very heavily vegetated and the plan, if approved, 32 <br />would mean that all of the trees outside of the wetland area be removed. He then indicated that 33 <br />Staff recommends requiring that any trees located within the right-of-way be preserved and allow 34 <br />only removal for driveway access. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Director Ericson indicated that Staff would need to discuss with the applicant the addition of a 37 <br />trailway to the plan. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Director Ericson suggested that Council discuss the issues with the hydrology of the site. He 40 <br />then said that the Planning Commission recommended denial but Staff has been advised by the 41 <br />City Attorney that this plat does satisfy the City’s Code and he advises the Council to approve the 42 <br />preliminary plat with specific conditions that would address and resolve any issues of the 43 <br />residents and the City with regard to the hydrology and other issues. 44 <br /> 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.