My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2004/02/23
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
Agenda Packets - 2004/02/23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:33 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 2:17:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/23/2004
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/23/2004
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
METRO-INET\BARB.COLLINS
Created:
8/1/2018 2:18 PM
Modified:
8/1/2018 2:18 PM
Text:
http://www.kennedy-graven.com/
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Kennedy 470 Pillsbury Center <br />200 South Sixth Street <br />Minneapolis MN 55402 <br />& <br />Graven Scott J. Riggs <br />(612) 337-9260 telephone <br />(612) 337-9310 fax <br />http://www.kennedy-graven.com <br />sriggs@kennedy-graven.com <br />C H A R T E R E D <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: February 18, 2004 <br /> <br />TO: Jim Ericson, Community Development Director <br /> <br />FROM: Scott J. Riggs, City Attorney <br /> <br />RE: Review of Titlework for Waldoch Minor Subdivision <br /> <br />Pursuant to your request, our office has reviewed the titlework/evidence that was submitted by the developer for <br />the above-referenced proposed minor subdivision. It appears that the following three issues are raised by the <br />minor subdivision: <br /> <br />1. The legal description of Lot 31 as shown on the survey as “existing legal” isn’t as stated in the final <br />certificate; <br /> <br />2. As to Outlot A, it is a tax-forfeited parcel and Title Standard No. 45 may apply; and <br /> <br />3. Should the legal descriptions be approved by the examiner of titles for Ramsey County? <br /> <br />The responses to the above-referenced issues are as follows: <br /> <br />1. It appears that the legal description on the surveyor’s certificate is incorrect, with respect to the parcel in <br />Lot 31, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 89. The legal description should match the legal description on the certificate <br />of title – with no exception for the land in the final certificate. The state of Minnesota did not take the land in fee, <br />but only took an easement. <br /> <br />2. Outlot A is a tax-forfeited parcel and Title Standard No. 45 applies. It appears from the RPA that title to <br />Outlot A is still held in the name of Citywide Development, Inc., subject to the interest acquired by the Waldochs <br />from the state of Minnesota. The Waldochs will not have clear title to Outlot A unless they do a “proceeding <br />subsequent” to establish the requirements at paragraph b of Title Standard No. 45, or unless they wait until <br />August 15, 2011, and then get an examiner’s directive from the examiner of titles for Ramsey County for the <br />issuance of a new certificate of title. <br /> <br />3. It does not appear that anything exists that requires the examiner of titles to approve legal descriptions in <br />this matter, but it probably is good practice to ask the registrar to pre-approve the legal descriptions as proposed <br />for the minor subdivision. <br /> <br />Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have regarding this matter. <br /> <br />SJR:jms <br /> <br />SCOTT J. RIGGS <br />Attorney at Law <br />Direct Dial (612) 337-9260 <br />Email: sriggs@kennedy-graven.com
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.