My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2004/03/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
Agenda Packets - 2004/03/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:01 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 2:27:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/22/2004
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/22/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 8, 2004 <br />Regular Meeting Page 9 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Council Member Gunn asked if the water is being handled efficiently now. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated it is not but it is part of the City’s local water management 4 <br />plan to have the water flow down through the storm sewer and the plan calls for a large pond in 5 <br />the area to treat the water. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated that the City’s Comprehensive Plan calls for sidewalks on 8 <br />Groveland Road and Staff recommends that with any of these street reconstructions the sidewalk 9 <br />be constructed at the time the street is upgraded. He then said that Staff recommends that the 10 <br />sidewalk be placed directly behind the curb to limit the impact to the residents whose homes are 11 <br />on the sidewalk. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Mayor Linke indicated the costs for the sidewalk were included in the proposed assessment 14 <br />figures. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Council Member Stigney indicated that there were residents that spoke on the question of 17 <br />whether there is a benefit of having the sidewalk at all and the residents have said they do not 18 <br />want it so he votes no. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Tammy Abelseth addressed the Council and provided a petition with signatures from the 21 <br />residents on Groveland Road that do not want the sidewalk. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Council Member Marty indicated he drove up to check it out and he would like to have this put 24 <br />in as an alternate bid which means that the City can act on it but does not have to. He then said 25 <br />that he is in favor of getting sidewalks and trailways wherever it is prudent and this stretch of 26 <br />pathway or sidewalk has been planned for years. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Council Member Quick indicated he would like the sidewalk. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Council Member Gunn indicated that she would like the sidewalk. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Mayor Linke indicated he is in favor of the park and trailway system and he is in favor of the 33 <br />sidewalk in this location. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Bob Edmond of 7835 Groveland Road indicated the sidewalk looks good on paper and he would 36 <br />like to see a sidewalk but this sidewalk leads to a crossing at Highway 10. He then reminded 37 <br />Council that there was a child killed at a controlled intersection on Highway 10 a few years ago 38 <br />and he would recommend that Council carefully consider a way to control Highway 10 before 39 <br />bringing people there on a sidewalk. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Council Member Stigney commented that he heard nothing about costs from residents it was that 42 <br />they live there and do not want it and he does not feel the City should force a sidewalk on them. 43 <br /> 44
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.