My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-03-1999
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
11-03-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 2:48:18 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 2:48:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/3/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
10. The title of Section 1008.11 is changed to reflect what is actually discussed in the • <br /> section. <br /> I have sent a copy of the draft ordinance to the City Attorney's office for review and comment. <br /> At the request of the Commission I have also asked the City attorney to suggest some "sunset" <br /> language which would allow the code to revert back to its present form if the state does not allow <br /> any billboards. As I indicated to the Planning Commission on July 7th,the City Attorney's office <br /> is reviewing two related matters. These include whether there are deed restrictions which would <br /> preclude billboards on the golf course property and whether are not there would be spot zoning <br /> issues. I have not yet received any further information from the City Attorney concerning these <br /> issues. <br /> I also sent a copy of the proposed ordinance to a consultant to the billboard industry and received <br /> comments back subsequent to the July 7th meeting. Mr. Cronin commented that he felt it was a <br /> reasonable ordinance but requested that the City consider one change. The change was to allow <br /> signs that would have an angle greater than 35 degrees to allow sign faces side by side. I have <br /> attached his comments which include an illustration of the type of sign he would like allowed. <br /> I also indicated to the Planning Commission on July 7th that, in terms of maximizing potential <br /> sites on the golf course,the proposed minimum spacing could be reduced from 1500 feet to 1000 <br /> feet. • <br /> The second ordinance amendment allows and sets standards for signs in PF and CRP zoning <br /> districts. The current code does not list any permitted signage or standards in either of these <br /> districts. The draft ordinance allows signs consistent with neighborhood business districts and <br /> with the pedestal sign requirements in Section 1008.01 Subdivision 6 in the PF and CRP <br /> districts. This is open for discussion. The amount of signage allowed may be more than <br /> necessary. The existing signage at parks in a neighborhood setting appears to range from 18 to 20 <br /> square feet total sign area while the main City Hall sign is approximately.128 square feet in area. <br /> The total freestanding signage at the Community Center appears to be approximately 90 square <br /> feet. Signage at the golf course has been at times as much as 130 square feet. <br /> REQUESTED ACTION: It is requested that the Planning Commission continue its discussion of <br /> the attached draft ordinances and suggest any changes that may be necessary. The Commission <br /> should also discuss what kind of public input process should be utilized. At a future meeting the <br /> Planning Commission will be asked to make a formal recommendation of ordinances to the City <br /> Council. <br /> N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\PLANCOMM\7-15-99B.MEM <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.