Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission October 20, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> 4. Approval of Minutes • <br /> A. September 15, 1999 <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Laube/Kaden to approve the September 15, 1999 meeting minutes as <br /> corrected.. <br /> Ayes–6 Nays-0 :A. The motion carried. <br /> ski"i <br /> Aso <br /> 5. PlanningCase No. 559-99 r<. „ �ry.':•; �f <br /> s; r . tax.;> £ . <br /> Property Involved: 2670 County Road I <br /> Iwo, ,: "`'`.. <br /> Discussion regarding a development review for a two-story,4jaibbIR§Sisted living residential facility. <br /> Applicant: MSP Real Estate " votaideN <br /> ir '�eiq::xa:::a �„ <br /> NiOntk. <br /> oinow, Vow <br /> The applicant was present. »'"'' <br /> s'- <br /> de <br /> Planning Associate Ericson gave the stall'•eport as follows;::;.:v ;k:$> <br /> :,w <br /> The applicant, MSP Real Estate, hajuestecl„ pproval o 'a development review for a two-story • <br /> senior assisted living complex to beijegted at `70 Count Road I. The City Council has approved <br /> the conditional use permit for this s velopme swellf the ordinance rezoning the property from <br /> ,. <br /> B-2, LimitedBusiness Com` ercial, to R-4fIggiagity Residential. <br /> . ,:}+.y.,4}i:.w '.Vic.. �tj [-,j�' ,: <br /> The applicanti as indicated Modeemont of the building on the site, and has revised the footprint of <br /> V-Wathe structure t >1tFinto compliance th the setback requirments. Planning Associate Ericson <br /> explained that the sit,::::".' :;..:. rovided tot<e Commission indicated an encroachment of the building <br /> into the setbackhas beeresolved through a slight adjustment of the structure, which <br /> places it gar to the p' t n lot. <br /> • <br /> ':1:61160— <br /> Plana Associate Ericson ind cated all of the dimensional and parking lot requirements are met with <br /> this He provided the Commission with a memorandum prepared by the applicant in <br /> response to the Staff Xitort, which addresses and satisfies staff's concerns with regard to the site <br /> Aar view. ”. <br /> P9., >: >. .' elate Ericson stated that one half of the drainage flow at the site would be directed <br /> toward 'aunty Road I, and the remainder, toward Mounds View Drive. He explained the drainage <br /> plan has been reviewed by the Public Works Director who has found that the amount of runoff at the <br /> site will not be significant, and any excess runoff will be diverted into available on-site green space <br /> and City storm sewers. He indicated that there appear to be no issues with regard to the drainage. <br /> III <br />