|
Mounds View Planning Commission November 3, 1999
<br /> Regular Meeting Page 5
<br /> • Commissioner Hegland stated the median was somewhat inconsequential in that if someone sees an
<br /> entrance at this location, and are not aware there is an entrance on Mounds View Drive, they will
<br /> attempt to enter the site from this location. Commissioner Laube stated County Road I was under
<br /> the jurisdiction of the County, and the City has no control over it.
<br /> Mr. Pinkerton suggested they start with a sign which indicates "no leftturn" a 15. exit, and if
<br /> necessary, indicate"no entrance" on the other side of the sign later, and ;"'` : s.;`: s visible only to
<br /> traffic coming from the right.
<br /> Chair Peterson reiterated the earlier stated language of"Ri: right ou, t : %>V $ 'ate Signa,
<br /> Y �<
<br /> with the specific details determined either prior to the fi approval.. with : -;..$ ed
<br /> stafl's recommendation to list Item 1 d as a separate stip •n.
<br /> Planning Associate Ericson stated lb should also be a sepa - <,$1,,,,; ion indicating"Right in. right
<br /> out access onto County Road I,with appropriate signage t "*.,,would be indicated as the
<br /> second stipulation,with the third stipulation being the curr t Item 4indicates "Signage shall
<br /> be in compliance with the City Code and approve',L: "'.nal use pp- :
<br /> Commissioner Stevenson noted a contingencaddi :gl .:. < 'ng sills, in the event the facility's
<br /> parking was found to be inadequate. He ed it a•.t,=ar ` `:`� ` s enc was omitted when the
<br /> p g q �,��::•: g Y
<br /> applicant indicated that 31 parking s < s woul• ;e pro d' and inquired if there was still a
<br /> • contingency for overflow parkinga . $dition. ails.
<br /> Planning Associate Ericson expl.'‘,.\-=‘, "he app' kk..,has an arrangement with Silver View Plaza,
<br /> to utilize the ear of their p.- . . of in the ng overflow.
<br /> •
<br /> Commiss on "`tom -` son ino 4 • ff-re was any possibility of conditional parking on the site in the
<br /> future, or ift •<•}5 . , g�a
<br /> g st. ", , a,4. urn, even if this was found to be inadequate. Planning
<br /> Associate Eric ` ,- e bely4it' .'te design utilized as much area as possible for parking
<br /> spaces. M
<br /> Co oner Stevens(); : • if_there wasadditional room to P g area_inth-
<br /> futu,t,K. he would like t•f kVa e this contingency in the resolution. Planning Associate Ericson
<br /> ad .d if it is discover-gig 'during the course of the operation that the parking is not adequate, the
<br /> ional use permit ".1,4 be revisited, and the matter can be brought back before the City Council
<br /> 0 „ •dressed. '
<br /> . :
<br /> , ' ):Peterson/Kaden. To Approve Mounds View Planning Commission Resolution
<br /> No.'-,'. '' Resolution Recommending Approval of a Development Review for a Two-story, 46-
<br /> Room Senior Assisted Residential Facility Located at 2670 County Road I; Planning Case No. 573-
<br /> 99, as Amended to Indicate Item lb as Stipulation 2, "Right In, Right Out Access Onto County Road
<br /> I,with Appropriate Signage," and Item ld as Stipulation 3, "Signage Shall.Be in Compliance With
<br /> the City Code and Approved Conditional Use Permit."
<br /> 411
<br />
|