My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-17-1999
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
11-17-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 2:58:22 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 2:56:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/17/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission November 3, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> • Planning Associate Ericson requested the Commission discuss these issues. He stated at the last <br /> meeting, the Commission concluded 32 feet would be an adequate driveway width, however, the <br /> question is if there are two driveways on one property, should they be 16 or 18 feet wide, and what <br /> would be the appropriate curb cut width. <br /> Chair Peterson noted there was also a question in regard to a numbe of sing .mily homes <br /> constructed on R-2 lots, which should be taken into account as well. - •1. s some of these <br /> properties are inappropriately zoned R-2, when their uses are c ently ' e ;ever, they currently <br /> exist in this manner and language may be required to addr- <br /> Planning Associate Ericson advised that Subdivision 5b of .1.09,Pa of th- . ::� . :. �.tes <br /> "No curb cut access shall exceed 24 feet in width for R- .s : $R-5 . sidential use .'`` ..wide <br /> curb cut shall be permissible for R-2, R-3 and R-4 us:, :explained this lan_ua. could be <br /> interpreted to indicate a single family home is not an R-2-s ":' ise, it could be amended to <br /> indicate a single family dwelling or use, as opposed to t o `4 1.` <br /> ., . t reference. <br /> Chair Peterson pointed out that the language alte ; etween t •' and the use, and this <br /> presents a conflict. Planning Associate Ericso. anguage could be amended and made <br /> consistent, and brought back to the Plannin! . irnmis•° `,..1 s "_& ,.next. eeting. <br /> Chair Peterson stated the 32-foot drivew width .4;4 not see _seasonable, as the current 30-foot <br /> • maximum did not appear to be acco$ • dating <br /> Commissioner Hegland inquired 40-foo .th be allowed, as this was currentlybeing <br /> constructed. .hair Peterson 4 , ?gin out tha fipoti . esult in an excessive amount of impervious <br /> surface. <br /> Commissio s ated t 4 width in the R-2 and R-3 District should be 36 feet. He <br /> explained that R •t wid .µY .,::. ith a 16-foot driveway straight from each garage door <br /> over, and alio ';,i ;t mthe cet'the driveway width would be 36 feet. He commented that <br /> the majo lotthese constructed closer to the road, and it would be difficult to park a <br /> veluc,l-a» - . •ve••. • ; o> #. • -. sown any further. <br /> C. � }• ssioner Stevenso :$!tinted out that the driveways of most twin homes, even if they both have <br /> 3> _: $':arages, do not n. sarily go straight back. He explained that the person with a 3 car garage <br /> have a 22-f• curb cut, and if this is a back to back twin home, he could not see allowing <br /> atAite • - �. , because the driveway will be jointly used. <br /> Co ` • r Laube reiterated most town homes are built closer to the road, and with a narrower <br /> driveway, parked vehicles could very easily block the other garage. <br /> Commissioner Hegland stated the driveways should be allowed to go straight back 40 feet. He <br /> • explained that a single family home is permitted 11 feet per car, and this is restricted to 10 feet for <br /> twin homes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.