Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council May 24, 2004 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />B. Resolution 6269 Approving the Preliminary Feasibility Report, Waiving the 2 <br />Public Improvement Hearing, Ordering the Project, and Authorizing the 3 <br />Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the Hidden Hollow Street and 4 <br />Utility Improvement Project. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated that Staff is recommending that this be discussed by 7 <br />Council. He then discussed Page 6 of the feasibility study with Council where the project costs 8 <br />were laid out indicating that Staff recommends that the City bear the entire cost for relocating the 9 <br />northern trunk storm sewer and that the developer pay 100% cost of the southern portion. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated that Staff recommends the manhole area be cleared out by 12 <br />the developer and that class five be added to enable Staff to get back there to maintain it and that 13 <br />would be a utility cost to the City. 14 <br /> 15 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Marty. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 6269, a 16 <br />Resolution Approving the Preliminary Feasibility Report, Waiving the Public Improvement 17 <br />Hearing, Ordering the Project, and Authorizing the Preparation of Plans and Specifications for 18 <br />the Hidden Hollow Street and Utility Improvement Project. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Gary Nordness from ProCraft addressed Council and asked that the Resolution be amended to 21 <br />allow the project to move forward while the remaining issues are being worked out. He then 22 <br />assured Council that they intend to execute the development agreement as is required. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Public Works Director Lee explained that everything would be on hold until the development 25 <br />agreement is executed and the appropriate security submitted to the City. 26 <br /> 27 <br />City Attorney Riggs indicated that he saw no issue with moving forward while resolving the 28 <br />remaining issues. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Council Member Quick asked if it was a good idea. 31 <br /> 32 <br />City Attorney Riggs indicated that, based on all discussions he has had, he does not see that this 33 <br />would cause great exposure to the City. He then said that the developer has invested a lot of 34 <br />money and they are close to a final agreement. 35 <br /> 36 <br />City Attorney Riggs suggested an amendment of: “The City Council approves the report, orders 37 <br />the project and waives” be inserted into the document. 38 <br /> 39 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Linke/Marty. To Amend Resolution 6269 as Recommended by the City 40 <br />Attorney. 41 <br /> 42 <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 1(Quick) Motion carried. 43 <br /> 44 <br />Ayes – 4 Nays – 1(Quick) Motion carried. 45