My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2004/06/14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
Agenda Packets - 2004/06/14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:32 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 4:30:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/14/2004
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/14/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
209
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council May 24, 2004 <br />Regular Meeting Page 11 <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich reviewed the City’s vision and mission statement in a Power Point 1 <br />presentation. He also reviewed the City’s goals and values. 2 <br /> 3 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Marty. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 6248, a 4 <br />Resolution Adopting the City’s Vision and Mission Statement. 5 <br /> 6 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 7 <br /> 8 <br />G. Resolution 6255 Adopting the City Goals Program 9 <br /> 10 <br />Mayor Linke read the goals. 11 <br /> 12 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Quick. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 6255, a 13 <br />Resolution Adopting the City Goals Program. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Council Member Stigney indicated that this calls for implementing the revitalization plan for 16 <br />Highway 10 and he has issues implementing the current plan. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Council Member Marty suggested changing the wording to implementing a plan. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Council Member Stigney suggested to amend the wording to a plan rather than the revitalization 21 <br />plan. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Council Member Quick indicated that Council voted and approved “the” plan. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Council Member Stigney indicated he has a problem with the plan. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Council Member Quick indicated there is a plan that was approved by vote so Members are free 28 <br />to vote against the parts they do not agree on. 29 <br /> 30 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Marty. To Change the Wording to “a plan” rather than “the plan”. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Council Member Gunn commented that there is a plan that was approved and changing the 33 <br />wording is like starting over so she would like to stick with the plan. She then said that there are 34 <br />parts of the plan that she does not agree with either but there is a plan in place that should be 35 <br />started. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Council Member Stigney indicated that he did not agree with the plan with the last Council so he 38 <br />will not support the plan now. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Council Member Quick commented that the plan was passed by Council and one of the things 41 <br />that is in front of Council later on the agenda is to agree not to try to sabotage decisions 42 <br />previously made by Council. 43 <br /> 44 <br /> Ayes – 1(Stigney) Nays – 4 Motion carried. 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.