My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2004/07/12
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
Agenda Packets - 2004/07/12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:58 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 4:40:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/12/2004
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/12/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
325
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 28, 2004 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Council Member Marty stated that the amount that is listed for land acquisition appears to be 2 <br />grossly low, and that if that is the case, then the site improvements would be low. He stated he 3 <br />didn’t know how road improvements would be, but $3.5 million for just the business area along 4 <br />County Highway 10 is low. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Economic Development Director Backman stated his response was that you don’t always know 7 <br />what projects will be occurring out there, so there is going to be some variations. He stated it is 8 <br />challenging to predict these things. He stated the TIF advisors suggested this amount. He stated 9 <br />he would be reluctant to raise it above the $9.1 million. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Council Member Stigney stated that page 9, last paragraph, conflicts with number 5 on the actual 12 <br />resolution. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Economic Development Director Backman stated that they’ve delineated these various parcels to 15 <br />be included potentially to be acquired, but that doesn’t mean they are going to acquire them. He 16 <br />stated he would like to make an addition to the resolution in at No. 1, second sentence, to say, 17 <br />“The Project Plan Modification is in response to a settlement dated May 14, 2003, with the 18 <br />Office of the State Auditor and Attorney General, which includes the listing of specific properties 19 <br />authorized for acquisition.” 20 <br /> 21 <br />Economic Development Director Backman stated he had received one comment from the public, 22 <br />and her concern was that when they do get to the projects, that they are compatible with the 23 <br />neighborhoods that are next to them. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Mayor Linke closed the public hearing. 26 <br /> 27 <br />MOTION/SECOND. Quick/Marty. To waive the reading and approve Resolution No. 6296, 28 <br />Resolution Adopting the Modification to the Project Plan for the Mounds View Economic 29 <br />Development Project, with the amendment as stated by Economic Development Director 30 <br />Backman to No. 1. 31 <br /> 32 <br /> Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried. 33 <br /> 34 <br />B. 7:05 p.m. Public Hearing to Consider a Variance and Conditional Use 35 <br />Permit Request for an Oversized Garage at 2208 Lois Drive. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Mayor Linke opened the public hearing. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Planning Associate Prososki stated Michael Read is the property owner of 2208 Lois Drive, and 40 <br />he is requesting a variance and conditional use permit for an oversized garage. She stated this 41 <br />was brought before the Planning Commission on May 19th, and the variance was denied by the 42 <br />Planning Commission. She stated Mr. Read was exercising his right to appeal to the Council. 43 <br />She stated he wanted to add 26 feet on the west side of the existing garage, which would make 44 <br />the width 48 feet, which is 13 feet in excess of what is allowed by City Code. 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.