Laserfiche WebLink
Item No: 10F <br />Meeting Date: September 27, 2004 <br />Type of Business: CB <br />Administrator Review: ____ <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, Community Development Director <br />Item Title/Subject: Accept the Spring Creek Basin Wetland Delineation <br />Report and Hydrology Analysis and Authorize the Field <br />Verification and Digital Conversion of the City’s Official <br />Wetland Zoning Maps <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />On February 9, 2004, the City Council authorized staff to proceed with the creation and <br />distribution of an RFP for services associated with the Spring Creek Wetland Basin west of <br />Silver Lake Road and north of County Road H. The purpose for the RFP stemmed from the <br />fact that the Wetland Zoning Maps do not accurately reflect actual conditions which means <br />that some residents are potentially being unnecessarily subjected to heightened <br />requirements and regulations pertaining to wetlands and wetland buffers. <br /> <br />On July 26, 2004, the City Council authorized the firm of SEH, Inc. to perform a wetland <br />delineation and hydrology analysis of the Spring Creek basin in part to obtain a true <br />delineation of the wetland as well as to review and comment on the City’s wetland regulations <br />in general. On August 31, 2004, SEH delivered their completed findings to city staff. <br /> <br />Results: <br /> <br />The delineation performed by SEH indicates that the wetland boundaries are in fact different <br />than what is identified on the official Wetland Zoning Maps. (Exhibit A represents the existing <br />wetland boundaries; Exhibit B illustrates the SEH delineation.) The changes may have <br />resulted from gradual hydrological shifts over time or are simply the representative <br />differences between a precise field verified delineation and a non-field verified boundary <br />based on aerial photographs and assumed elevations. Regardless of the cause, the <br />boundaries of the wetland are different than what are currently shown on the City’s official <br />Wetland Zoning Map and the maps should be revised accordingly. <br /> <br />SEH was asked to review and comment on the City’s wetlands regulations as codified under <br />Chapter 1010 of the Municipal Code. They report that the 100-foot buffer is NOT excessive <br />and they would not recommend decreasing the buffer width. The following language is taken <br />directly from the Spring Creek Report: <br /> <br />In general, the basin has relatively steep topography and most homes and existing <br />structures are well above any elevation or buffer width that would affect the <br />wetland, buffer, or hydraulic characteristics of the basin. Not all portions of the <br />basin are equal, however, in many portions, mostly on the north side, the buffer <br />area is much more gradual and is currently being used for backyards. Some of <br />these are just wooded and left natural, but a few have maintained turf up to, and <br />even within, the wetland. Because the topography is not equal throughout the <br />basin, and existing homes already have a variety of setbacks, it would be difficult <br />to justify changing the rules specifically for this basin.