My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2004/10/11
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
Agenda Packets - 2004/10/11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:30 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 5:21:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/11/2004
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/11/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council September 27, 2004 <br />Regular Meeting Page 13 <br /> <br /> Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried. 1 <br /> 2 <br />D Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 749, Amending Section 9.01, of 3 <br />the City Charter regarding Acquisition of Property (Roll Call Vote). 4 <br /> 5 <br />Mayor Linke stated that the only change here was adding the words “as amended”. 6 <br /> 7 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Gunn. To waive the reading and adopt Ordinance 749, Amending 8 <br />Section 9.01 of the City Charter regarding Acquisition of Property. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Council Member Marty asked City Attorney Riggs why, if state statute takes precedence over 11 <br />City Charter, this even needs to be in here. 12 <br /> 13 <br />City Attorney Riggs stated that this is one of the provisions the City will be able to use to acquire 14 <br />property. He stated the legislature has left some room for the City to interpret or do other things 15 <br />with it, then you usually put it in your Charter or your City Code. He stated that Chapter 117 16 <br />basically sets out the broad concept of eminent domain, and the City is saying, yes, we will 17 <br />exercise that. 18 <br /> 19 <br />Council Member Stigney stated that this would take the ambiguity out of Chapter 117. 20 <br /> 21 <br />City Attorney Riggs stated that they are looking at 1980 law, and Chapter 117 has been changed 22 <br />a number of times since then. 23 <br /> 24 <br />ROLL CALL: Linke/Quick/Marty/Stigney/Gunn. 25 <br /> 26 <br /> Ayes –5 Nays – 0 Motion carried 27 <br /> 28 <br />E. Resolution 6362 Step Increase for Officer Benjamin Zender and a Longevity 29 <br />Increase for Steve Menard of the Mounds View Police Department. 30 <br /> 31 <br />MOTION/SECOND. Marty/Gunn. To adopt Resolution 6362, Step Increase for Officer 32 <br />Benjamin Zender and a Longevity Increase for Steve Menard of the Mounds View Police 33 <br />Department. 34 <br /> 35 <br /> Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried. 36 <br /> 37 <br />F. Resolution 6359 Accepting the Spring Creek Wetland Delineation and 38 <br />Hydrology Report and Authorizing Field Verification and Digital 39 <br />Conversion of the City’s Official Wetland Zoning Maps. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Director Ericson stated that the Council had authorized Staff to proceed with the creation and 42 <br />distribution of an RFP to do the wetland delineation in the Spring Creek Basin. He stated Staff 43 <br />felt the delineation as depicted on the wetland zoning maps from the late 1970’s were in error. 44 <br />He stated the delineation that was conducted by SEH did show that the boundary had shifted 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.