My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2004/10/11
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
Agenda Packets - 2004/10/11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:30 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 5:21:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/11/2004
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/11/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council September 27, 2004 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> <br />David Jahnke, 8420 Eastwood Road, thanked the four Council members for basically changing 1 <br />their minds regarding the golf course. He stated that the average income per household in 2 <br />Mounds View is not very high, and that the levy limits are off again, so they are going to get 3 <br />nailed again. He stated he had a note from five people that said it was nice to golf at the Bridges, 4 <br />and not one of them lived in Mounds View, so they were paying for other people to enjoy playing 5 <br />golf. He stated there is another golf course right around the corner. He stated he couldn’t figure 6 <br />out why the Mayor had told Barb Hockey that they only lost $200,000 on the golf course when 7 <br />the Finance Director had stated that it was a million. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Mayor Linke stated the $200,000 had come from the lawsuit, because it had cost $300,000, and 10 <br />they had won $100,000. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Mr. Jahnke stated that this year would be worse because of the weather, so they would be taking 13 <br />another beating on the golf course. 14 <br /> 15 <br />City Clerk/City Administrator Ulrich stated that they would be discussing the golf course 16 <br />alternatives in a broader fashion at the Work Session to be held on October 4th. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Mike Marosney, 5545 Brighton Lane, stated he sees a real mismanagement of the taxpayer’s 19 <br />money after watching the City Council meetings on cable the last several months. He stated that 20 <br />it’s the taxpayer’s money, and the Council needs to really look at what they are spending the 21 <br />money on. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Mayor Linke stated he was speaking in generalities. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Mr. Marosney stated that the manager at the Bridges golf course had been given a raise, and that 26 <br />he himself had not had a raise in three years because the company he works for hasn’t made any 27 <br />money. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Mayor Linke stated that the City had to live up to its contracts. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Council Member Quick stated, regarding the raise, that the City is governed by a different set of 32 <br />rules and laws than private industry, and they need to meet those obligations. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Council Member Quick stated that the golf course is a piece of property that they don’t know 35 <br />whether they can sell. He stated that they also have a contract for some signs, and that the 36 <br />interested party doesn’t want anything to do with the signs. He stated when the golf course was 37 <br />built, there was 90 percent acceptance in the City. He stated that nobody had polled what the 38 <br />citizens want at this time. He stated if they did a professional poll that came back with less than 39 <br />50 percent, he would be the first one to vote to sell it. He stated the golf course carries all the 40 <br />debt from the lawsuit. He stated that he felt that the City Council had erred, and that the City 41 <br />should have picked that up. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Mr. Marosney asked why there was a lawsuit. 44 <br /> 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.