My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2004/10/11
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
Agenda Packets - 2004/10/11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:30 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 5:21:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/11/2004
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/11/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council September 27, 2004 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br /> <br />Council Member Quick said it was probably only about five. He stated that the property owners 1 <br />would not lose in that situation because they get more than market value for their home, plus the 2 <br />City has to pay for them to move. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Council Member Stigney stated that there was no individual contract with the golf course 5 <br />manager and she is not a union employee. He stated the personnel policy of the City had been 6 <br />followed which guaranteed employees a certain wage bracket every year based on what other 7 <br />cities in the metro area are doing. He stated he didn’t think it was a good policy, and that 8 <br />hopefully they’ll be able to change that in the future. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Council Member Stigney stated it was important to look at other options for possible 11 <br />redevelopment of the golf course, and that they are on track with that, and he fully supports any 12 <br />type of development that would take the golf course off the taxpayers’ backs and put it on the 13 <br />revenue source for the City. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Council Member Stigney stated the only time he would support eminent domain would be for a 16 <br />public purpose such as a highway or hospital, but not to take somebody’s private property and 17 <br />put in another private development. 18 <br /> 19 <br />6. CITY BUDGET QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS 20 <br /> 21 <br />None. 22 <br /> 23 <br />7. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS 24 <br /> 25 <br />A. Resolution (6360) of Appreciation to Liz Song for her Contributions on the Mounds 26 <br />View Planning Commission. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Mayor Linke read the Resolution of Appreciate for Liz Song aloud. 29 <br /> 30 <br />MOTION/SECOND. Linke/Marty. To adopt the Resolution 6360 , in Appreciation to Liz Song 31 <br />for her Contributions on the Mounds View Planning Commission. 32 <br /> 33 <br /> Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried. 34 <br /> 35 <br />B. Resolution 6374 Appointing Gary Meehlhause to the Planning Commission. 36 <br /> 37 <br />MOTION/SECOND. Gunn/Marty. To adopt Resolution 6374 Appointing Gary Meehlhause to 38 <br />the Planning Commission. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Council Members Stigney and Marty stated they were glad that he had applied. 41 <br /> 42 <br /> Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried. 43 <br /> 44
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.