Laserfiche WebLink
Draft EDC Minutes <br /> February 20,2009 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> 6. EDC BUSINESS <br /> A. Discuss Potential Business Registration Program <br /> Ms. Steinmetz reminded the EDC that they discussed this item last summer as it related to <br /> business retention and how the City should have one, master business database rather than <br /> multiple databases among different City departments. <br /> Ms. Steinmetz said that Building Official Kathi Osmonson is the lead City staff person for this <br /> project and that Ms. Osmonson presented ideas for the program to the City Council on <br /> January 5, 2009. Ms. Steinmetz's concern with the program relates to a potential fee. <br /> Businesses should not be charged a fee to register with the City, according to Steinmetz. <br /> The Chamber's Economic Advancement Committee discussed the program at their January <br /> meeting and Ms. Steinmetz provided the EDC with their input. One of the ideas from the <br /> Chamber Committee was to only charge a fee if the business did not provide the <br /> information. <br /> Commissioner Belting stated that there is a clear distinction between filling out a business <br /> registration form with current contract information and a fire inspection. He said that some of <br /> the other cities' business registration programs seem to blend registrations with fire <br /> inspections. He said that the EDC should discuss whether the program should be"blended" <br /> or whether we should keep the two items separate. He asked if there is a fee for fire <br /> inspections and Ms. Steinmetz said that she does not believe there is a fee. <br /> • Commissioners Heigemoe,Wagner and Larson said that we should not impose a fee for the <br /> registration program. Commissioner Larson added that we should keep registrations <br /> separate from building inspections but that the information could be combined. <br /> Chamber President Tim Roche said,that the Chamber's concern is that businesses could be <br /> charged unexpected fees due to the program because a building may pass an initial <br /> inspection but not pass the registration inspection. He also said that there needs to balance <br /> between the staff hours involved in creating the program versus the staff hours the program <br /> will save due to an efficient program. <br /> Chair Meehlhause agreed with the EDC's comments and said he preferred Maplewood's <br /> program but does not agree with a fee. <br /> The EDC agreed that there is a definite need for the City to have updated business contact <br /> information. <br /> Motion/Second: Commissioner Wagner moved and Commissioner Helgemoe seconded <br /> the motion recommending that the City Council consider the following: <br /> • The program should be an annual, voluntary registration (businesses should not be <br /> forced to provide the information; and, <br /> • If a business chooses not to register, after the second year of not providing the <br /> information, the business would be charged a penalty fee not to exceed $50; and, <br /> • <br />