Laserfiche WebLink
EDC Minutes <br /> February 17, 2017 <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br /> developers, others where industrial and still others were retail and senior housing <br /> developers. Staff was told that the Rice Creek Commons development. They are afraid <br /> to develop in Mounds View until they find out what is being developed in Arden Hills. <br /> They felt the Crossroad Pointe site is awkward and irregular shaped and doesn't have <br /> good access. The developers mentioned that it would be about 30 years until they would <br /> be comfortable developing anything at the site. They offered that in the meantime the <br /> site may be able to support a convenience store, gas station, auto sales, affordable <br /> housing, and senior housing. They felt that either affordable or senior housing would be <br /> able to make it at that site, but none of them felt that they would be willing to put forth the <br /> risk to build there. One developer mentioned a restaurant. In general, the Council's <br /> vision for this site has not matched the current demand. They Council had mentioned a <br /> downtown destination but the developers are not willing to do this and there isn't enough <br /> room at the site for this type of development. <br /> Helgemoe asked if the Bel Rae Senior Living facility was full. Beeman said it is nearing <br /> capacity and the developers for that facility are looking for more locations to build. The <br /> developers had expressed some interest in the site in the past, but at that time they <br /> weren't ready to build. Now, they are back in the hunt for land. Dominion, another senior <br /> housing developer was very interested in Crossroad Pointe, but they were too busy at <br /> the time, and missed the deadline to submit their proposal. Instead, they ended up going <br /> to Spring Lake Park. Rieland, asked if it would be an extension to what they already <br /> have. Beeman said the group is looking to build a four story with underground parking. <br /> Freichels said he was part of the joint meeting with the City Council when they were <br /> expressing their vision for the property. He has all along been concerned with the Rice <br /> Creek Commons and how that will affect Crossroad Pointe. Commissioner Muckala <br /> asked if this would be the fourth senior housing facility. If this facility would be built then <br /> it was thought that it would become the fourth facility. Muckala said this type of <br /> development may spur a demand for another type of need in the community like <br /> attracting a medical use. <br /> Beeman reviewed the type of developments that have expressed interest in the past. <br /> Among those have been daycare, flea market, public storage, restaurant, retail strip <br /> mall, senior housing, affordable housing, churches, etc. Many of these uses don't fit the <br /> Council's vision for this site and they wouldn't be the desired highest and best use. The <br /> demand equation is what drives developers. A person can't create demand. If it isn't <br /> there then it isn't there. All that can be done is to create awareness. Having three vacant <br /> blighted and substandard buildings isn't the best idea and that is why the Council <br /> decided to demolish all three buildings in the past. Rieland asked when the building was <br /> taken down. Beeman thought it was around 2008. Three visioning sessions were <br /> completed for the site and the first one include community input as well as an <br /> engineering report. Council Member Meehlhause offered some history of the site saying <br /> the first building demoed was the gas station off of County Road H2 and Mounds View <br /> Boulevard in the early 2000's. The City purchased because it was left abandoned and <br /> the owners weren't doing anything about it. A wind storm had damaged the canopy and <br /> pieces were dangling. They City then decided to purchase the Japanese Sushi <br /> restaurant and the Roberts' site in around 2013. So, it has been only about four years <br /> since those parcels were acquired. Beeman said a redevelopment TIF could have been <br /> used at that time if a project had been imminent. Now the use of TIF would be <br /> questionable unless it was a Housing TIF. Beeman said if this was an easy site then it <br />