My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-16-2010
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Commission (Disbanded)
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
04-16-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2018 4:55:41 AM
Creation date
8/3/2018 4:54:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV EDC
EDC Document Type
Council Packets
Date
4/16/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
a <br />City of Spring Lake Park <br />1301 Eighty First Avenue Northeast <br />Spring Lake Park, Nfinnesota 55432 <br />•I• <br />In our opinion, after this much time hag passed since the renaming of County <br />Road 10, the general public has gotten used, to the difference between State <br />Highway 10 and County Road 10. However, we were willing to work with <br />Mounds View as the issue seemed important to you. It is clear to us that we <br />wasted our time and energy. It is our contention that if we were to ask our <br />property owners their preference for a name, it would be Spring Lake Park <br />Boulevard and Blaine's property owners would choose Blaine Boulevard <br />however, it is not their responsibility to consider the bigger picture even when <br />we all appear to agree that "it would be advantageous to have one name for <br />the roadway as it passes through several north metro communities ...that could <br />and should serve as a common thread to identify and represent the north <br />suburban area as a whole." <br />In your letter you state that in your discussions with your City Council, "it <br />was acknowledged that a consistent name through our three communities <br />would be preferable however, it seems apparent that such a consensus may <br />not be reached." It seems apparent to us that a consensus may not be reached <br />because the City of Mounds View had already decided on a name and does <br />not wish to pursue other choices. <br />June10,2005 <br />Mayor <br />Harley Wells <br />Counciimembers <br />Jeanne Mason- <br />BarbamCarlson <br />- <br />Timothy C. Hawley <br />Robert Nelson <br />- <br />Mr, Kurt Ulrich, City Administrator <br />City of Mounds View <br />Administrator, <br />Clerk -Treasurer <br />2401 Highway 10: <br />Barbara L. Nelson <br />Mounds View, Mn. 55112-1499 <br />Chief of Police <br />David Toth <br />RE: Naming of County Road 10 <br />Parks & Recreation <br />Director <br />Marian Rygwall <br />Dear Kurt: <br />Public Works <br />It was with great disappointment that we received your letter of May 20, 2005 <br />Director <br />Direct <br />Terry Randall <br />regarding your City Council's decision to rename your portion of County. :.- <br />Road 10, "Mounds View Boulevard" in direct opposition to your Council's <br />stated goals. <br />In our opinion, after this much time hag passed since the renaming of County <br />Road 10, the general public has gotten used, to the difference between State <br />Highway 10 and County Road 10. However, we were willing to work with <br />Mounds View as the issue seemed important to you. It is clear to us that we <br />wasted our time and energy. It is our contention that if we were to ask our <br />property owners their preference for a name, it would be Spring Lake Park <br />Boulevard and Blaine's property owners would choose Blaine Boulevard <br />however, it is not their responsibility to consider the bigger picture even when <br />we all appear to agree that "it would be advantageous to have one name for <br />the roadway as it passes through several north metro communities ...that could <br />and should serve as a common thread to identify and represent the north <br />suburban area as a whole." <br />In your letter you state that in your discussions with your City Council, "it <br />was acknowledged that a consistent name through our three communities <br />would be preferable however, it seems apparent that such a consensus may <br />not be reached." It seems apparent to us that a consensus may not be reached <br />because the City of Mounds View had already decided on a name and does <br />not wish to pursue other choices. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.