My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-16-2010
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Commission (Disbanded)
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
04-16-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2018 4:55:41 AM
Creation date
8/3/2018 4:54:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV EDC
EDC Document Type
Council Packets
Date
4/16/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
April 16, 2010 EDC Meeting <br />Item 6A—Rename Hwy 10 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />Discussion <br />Reasons to Continue Discussion <br />There are now two main reasons in 2010 why Mounds View may want to reopen <br />discussions to name County Hwy/Rd 10 as it goes through Mounds View. The first reason <br />is to eliminate confusion between County 10 and State Trunk Hwy 10, both of which pass <br />through Mounds View. This confusion continues and will not disappear on its own. The <br />second reason is to continue to implement Mounds View's Brand Strategy. The purpose of <br />the Mounds View Branding Project was to give Mounds View an identity in the <br />marketplace. One way to do so is to by capitalizing on what makes Mounds View unique. <br />One thing that makes Mounds View unique compared to its neighbors is that Interstate <br />35W leads into Mounds View's main commercial corridor. <br />Costs to Replace Signage <br />A large part of the discussion to name County Hwy/Rd 10 is cost. In 2004, former City <br />Administrator reported to the Council that it would cost the City $1520,000 to replace local <br />road signs to reflect a County Hwy/Rd 10 name change. The Minnesota Department of <br />Transportation (MnDOT) also would charge the City to update signage on 35W. <br />Not only would there be cost to the City, there would be costs to the businesses located <br />along County Hwy/Rd 10 to change their letterhead, business cards, etc. Although <br />Ramsey County would still recognize County Hwy/Rd 10 as one of the corridor's names, <br />staff has not confirmed that systems like Google Maps, Yahoo Maps or Global Position <br />Systems (GPS) would recognize multiple corridor names. However, all of the County - <br />owned corridors in Mounds View have multiple names. List below and shown on the <br />attached map are Ramsey County roads located in Mounds View: <br />• Silver Lake Road is also County Road 44 <br />• Long Lake Road is also County Road 45 <br />• County Road H is also County Road 88 and 9 <br />• County Road I is also County Road 3 and 82 <br />• Old Hwy 8 is also County Road 77 <br />Preliminary Comments from Ramsey County Engineer <br />Staff recently inquired with the Ramsey County Engineer Ken Haider of the process to <br />name a County road. He noted in an e-mail to City staff that there is not a standard <br />procedure for such a request because it happens so infrequently. He added that all <br />County roads have a number that would not change and that he does not think the County <br />has any strong feelings about adding a name to County State Aid Highway 10 (CSAH 10). <br />He concluded by saying that if he receives a request from Mounds View through a City <br />Council resolution, he would take that request to the County Board for action. <br />Staff does not suggest that Mounds View reconvene the 2004/2005 committee or form a <br />new committee to name County Hwy/Rd 10. The former committee consisted of <br />representatives from Blaine, Coon Rapids, Mounds View, Spring Lake Park, Anoka <br />County, Ramsey County and the two local Chambers. Staff does not expect a different <br />outcome in 2010 than what the committee accomplished in 2005. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.