Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EDC Minutes <br />January 15, 2016 <br />Page 2 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />nominations of Vice Chair. Hearing none, Helgemoe asked if Freeichels would accept <br />the position. Freichels confirmed that he would accept the positon. <br /> <br />Motion/Second: Commissioner Freichels moved and Commissioner Larson seconded <br />the approval of Commissioner Helgemoe as the Chair and Commissioner Freichels as <br />Vice Chair. <br /> <br />Motion Carried: 6 Ayes, 0 Nays <br /> <br />Review Combined Tax Abatement & TIF Policy (Public Assistance Policy & Application) <br /> <br />Chair Helgemoe asked Business Development Coordinator Beeman to provide a <br />background to the Commission. Beeman informed the Commission that the Business <br />Subsidy Policy will be moving forward January 25, 2016 in a joint Council/EDA meeting <br />and Public Hearing. The new Public Assistance Policy & Application will be reviewed <br />February 1, 2016 at a Council Workshop meeting then if confirmed; it will go to the EDA <br />for approval at their February 8, 2016 meeting. No Public Hearing will be required for the <br />new Public Assistance Policy. <br /> <br />Beeman explained that both the city’s legal and financial consultants suggested that the <br />TIF and Tax Abatement Policies be combined into one policy, as this makes it simpler <br />for city staff, developers, consultant, and all involved, and it is what the consultants are <br />seeing as a trend in other metro city’s policies. The TIF policy was last updated in 2000 <br />and the Tax Abatement Policy was last updated in 2003. The new combined policy is <br />now called, City of Mounds View Economic Development Authority, Public Financing <br />Policy & Application. Ehler’s, the city’s financial consultant, combined the city’s existing <br />policies and is suggesting the EDC and EDA review the new version for consideration of <br />approval at the February 8, 2016 EDA meeting. <br /> <br />By combining the two policies, the new policy is condensed into essentially five pages <br />with the rest being the application and criteria for scoring. This simplifies the policy and <br />attempts to reference Minnesota State Statues as much as possible so that when the <br />statutes change, the policy also changes automatically without the need to change the <br />policy each time. <br /> <br />Section I Policy Purpose, of the new policy is very similar to the original policies. Any <br />reference to TIF or Tax Abatement was changed to Public Financing. Section II <br />Objectives for the Use of Public Financing was simplified from the former technical and <br />detailed language naming square footage etc. to a more basic guideline providing an <br />overview for policy makers. Other areas of the old policy referenced TIF pooling of funds <br />and other confusing concepts that are often changed by legislators. The consultants felt <br />that getting too technical in policies will only confuse and convolute the intent of the <br />policy. Section III dealing with Business Subsidies was cleaned up by removing <br />redundancies and simplifying the language to sync with the Business Subsidy Policy. <br />Section IV and V are virtually the same as the old policies. In Section VI Application <br />Process for Public Financing, the fees have been updated to a $3000 non-refundable <br />application fee. This fee will be used for any type of public financing and will cover the <br />initial legal and financial consulting fees to determine if the project qualifies or not. If the