My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-19-2016
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
02-19-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2018 5:42:26 AM
Creation date
8/3/2018 5:42:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV EDC
EDC Document Type
Council Packets
Date
2/19/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />EDC Minutes <br />January 15, 2016 <br />Page 4 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioner Dahlstrom asked if the EDC could set a date to review the document <br />providing an example of every two, five or seven years. Beeman stated that he tries to <br />watch any statutes that are related to economic development as well as Ehler’s and the <br />city’s legal team. Beeman also hears regular updates from the Economic Development <br />Association of Minnesota. However, the city hasn’t set a formal review date for these <br />policies. Beeman said establishing a regular review date is a good idea and he will <br />continue to stay updated as much as possible to changing Statutes. <br /> <br />Dahlstrom suggested that regular updates may be less costly than waiting a long time <br />then having to redo the entire policy. Helgemoe stated that even though the review of <br />the policies is more of an internal process and the attorneys review the statutes, it is <br />ultimately up to staff to make the changes. Beeman suggested that the EDC place it as <br />one of the goals for the 2016 EDC list of goals that will be discussed at the February <br />meeting. Helgemoe thought this was a good idea to place the review of policies as one <br />of the goals. Beeman agreed that this is something the EDC should discuss at the next <br />meeting. Helgemoe asked for any other comments on the policy. Hearing none, <br />Commissioner Freichels made a motion. <br /> <br />Motion/Second: Commissioner Freichels moved and Commissioner Dahlstrom <br />seconded the motion recommending that the combined policy move forward to the EDA <br />for consideration. <br /> <br />Motion Carried: 6 Ayes, 0 Nays <br /> <br />6. REPORTS OF STAFF <br /> <br />Crossroad Point Redevelopment Project <br /> <br />Business Development Coordinator, Beeman provided the Commission with an update <br />on the Crossroad Pointe redevelopment site. Beeman stated that staff has met with The <br />Beard Group to discuss the Preliminary Development Agreement. The Beard Group was <br />hung up on a few of the clauses but has since agreed to move forward in recommending <br />the Predevelopment Agreement to the EDA on January 25. <br /> <br />Helgemoe asked if The Beard Group was the only developer for the site. Beeman <br />informed the EDC that he had contacted approximately 40 or so developers with about <br />twelve showing interest and only one actually submitting a proposal. <br /> <br />Helgemoe asked if The Beard Group was one of the developers that the city had toured <br />last summer. Beeman confirmed that The Beard Group was the developer that the group <br />had toured at the Osseo site. Beeman stated that after the joint meeting with Council, <br />EDC, and the Planning Commission, that The Beard Group is the developer that the <br />group seemed to like the most as far as the product and since that time, the Council has <br />instructed staff to work with the developer to bring forward a Predevelopment <br />Agreement. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.