Laserfiche WebLink
PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW EDA <br />CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW <br />RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA <br /> <br />Regular Meeting <br />April 10, 2000 <br />Mounds View City Hall <br />2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 <br />7:21 P.M. <br /> <br /> <br />CALL MEETING TO ORDER <br /> <br />ROLL CALL: Coughlin, Marty, Quick, Stigney, and Thomason. <br /> <br />NOT PRESENT: None. <br /> <br />1. AGENDA ADDITIONS <br /> <br /> A. Approve agenda of April 10, 2000 <br /> <br />President Coughlin asked the Commission if anyone would like to add items to the agenda. <br /> <br />Vice President Stigney stated at the Work Session on April 3, an item to consider <br />communications from the New Brighton-Mounds View Chamber of Commerce concerning <br />membership on the Mounds View Economic Development Commission was before the Council. <br /> He stated this was the same item as that currently listed under EDA Business, however, at that <br />time, the item was deleted from the Work Session agenda, because it had come forward that the <br />member requested a Waiver of Public Hearing, and it was determined to be a moot point. He <br />inquired since the public hearing was not held at that time, why it was to take place at this time. <br /> <br />President Coughlin stated the reason this item was listed on the Work Session agenda was <br />because it had been determined that the EDA meeting that was previously called to order was not <br />in order, due to an oversight, in that at the beginning of the year, however, it was certainly <br />mentioned at the meeting on March 27th, the EDA did not set its meeting schedule for the entire <br />year, as the Council had. He explained that in light of this, the issue of the public hearing <br />required to be addressed once again, and that was the entire thrust of that particular item. He <br />indicated that the Commissioner in question presented documentation waiving their right to a <br />public hearing, therefore, it was not necessary to discuss this item at that time, however, it was <br />certainly mentioned at the meeting that this matter would be taken up this date, and legal staff <br />was also under the impression that April 10 was the date the item would be addressed. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Thomason. To approve the agenda of EDA for April 10, 2000, as <br />presented. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried.