My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-25-2003
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
08-25-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 9:07:20 AM
Creation date
8/3/2018 7:01:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
8/25/2003
Commission Doc Number (Ord & Res)
0
Supplemental fields
Date
8/25/2003
EDA Document Type
Council Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View EDA August 25, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> <br />out. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman indicated that the City could still do 15 years. <br /> <br />Commissioner Marty indicated he liked the change from $100,000 to $25,000 on Page 6. <br /> <br />Commissioner Marty asked whether the City’s costs referenced on 7a could be recovered if they <br />are more than the amount listed. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman indicated the costs were considered but the <br />Committee wants to encourage development but he said the wording could be changed from the <br />$1,000. <br /> <br />Commissioner Marty indicated that he did not want the City to pay for legal costs to redevelop. <br /> <br />Commissioner Marty asked how the public facility and infrastructure projects referenced on Page <br />8 could be done. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman indicated the City of Golden Valley recently used <br />funds for redoing the overpass and traffic lights leading into the General Mills complex and that <br />work was not directly on the property. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stigney indicated he would like the policy to state that this is to be used if TIF is <br />not applicable and the City should strive to use TIF whenever possible. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stigney indicated he would like to strengthen the language to require that two or <br />more objectives be met rather than one. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman indicated that other cities policies on TRF were <br />reviewed and most have been one or more. He then said that for many years TIF was the main <br />game in town and now TRF is getting more attention as it does have less administrative cost to <br />cities. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stigney indicated it also has the potential for recovering far less as well. He then <br />said he feels the City should utilize TIF wherever possible because it has more overall benefit to <br />the City. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stigney indicated he would like to see the language concerning costs amended. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman indicated he would amend the language. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.