Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View EDA April 11, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br /> <br />an important part of the discussion is that this hearing is to get information to the Council, and <br />for the Council to take some time to look that over, and not to make a hard and fast decision this <br />evening. He stated that he is opposed to TIF, and in his eight years as mayor, he didn’t do a <br />single TIF. He stated that at one time TIF served a good purpose and was necessary for <br />economic development. He stated that Mounds View’s TIF percentage of commercial industrial <br />is one of the highest in the Twin City area, and that means they are pre-empting tax revenue from <br />not only the city, but other districts as well, and in particular the school district. He stated the <br />Council should get input from the School Board on how TIF affects their operations. He stated <br />that the franchise fee issue is quite a debate at the legislature at this time, and he had read that the <br />applicant is willing to pay the franchise fee. He stated that the label of fees is on its last days. He <br />stated the taxpayers and many of our representatives in the legislature at this time are working <br />very hard to make sure that taxation is not only fair, but it’s up front where everybody can see it, <br />so he wouldn’t count on the franchise fee. He asked the Council to slow down a little bit, and <br />step back and take a harder look. He submitted some written comments to the Commission. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator stated that the water and sewer would be connected to the <br />city utilities from the south under Highway 10, and there would be a franchise fee generated from <br />that. He stated that currently the whole property is tax exempt right now, and there would be a <br />base that would generate revenues, and that base would be approximately $8 million. <br /> <br />Kevin Griffin, 8161 Red Oak Court, stated he has been a resident since 1988, and he stated he is <br />in support of the golf course. He stated he owns an underground construction company, and he <br />brings clients to the course and frequents the restaurants in Mounds View. He cautioned the <br />Council to exercise caution on committing any type of tax incentives for this project or any type <br />of project, especially to insure that there are guarantees or security in place that that type of <br />funding will be recovered in the future. He encouraged the Commission to pursue other <br />alternatives to reduce the debt of the golf course. <br /> <br />Greg Holee, 8192 Groveland Road, stated he is an admirer of Medtronic, but he and his wife are <br />golfers, and he thinks it’s a wonderful amenity. He stated it’s a nationally recognized facility, <br />and awards have been won for the youth development. He stated it would be a huge sense of loss <br />for the community to lose that facility. <br /> <br />Cindy Carlson, 2215 Kenwood Court, Maplewood, stated she is in favor of the proposed <br />acquisition by Medtronic. She stated she has participated in golfing at the Bridges, but she feels <br />it’s a tremendous opportunity to sell this property to Medtronic. She stated that not only is <br />Medtronic involved in a lot of different philanthropic activities that benefit the state and many of <br />the residents, but they also participate very actively in the community through the Twin Cities <br />North Area Chamber of Commerce in various committees on the Board of Directors and in <br />various fundraisers. <br /> <br />Dan Hall, 12860 Lever St, Blaine, stated that he has been operating the Mermaid in Mounds