My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-25-2005
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
04-25-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 9:06:33 AM
Creation date
8/3/2018 7:19:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
4/25/2005
Commission Doc Number (Ord & Res)
0
Supplemental fields
Date
4/25/2005
EDA Document Type
Council Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View EDA April 25, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 11 <br /> <br />for children and youth. He referenced the National Youth Center course and expressed concerns <br />and suggested that the Commission walk the youth center course and ask themselves is the <br />course truly designed for youth, as they state, or is it designed more for use by High School Golf <br />teams. He asked the Commission to consult an SRI Study done in 2002 noting that there is a <br />case that golf works, youth in golf works and the program at The Bridges works well for a lot of <br />children. He urged the Commissioners to think hard about the issues and what they have before <br />they make any decisions. <br /> <br />George Weinberger, 8011 Eastwood Road, stated that he is 20-years old and a product of the <br />youth program at The Bridges. He stated that he participated in their first youth program and <br />also in the high school programs. He stated that it was explained to him that when he entered the <br />voting process it was the way for him to choose the people he wanted to be his voice. He stated <br />that they are running a City, not a business and asked them not to lose such a precious asset to the <br />City. <br /> <br />John Ewing 10953 Xylite Park Lane stated that he treasures The Bridges. He stated that it is his <br />understanding that a deal has already been made to get the golf course paid for and asked <br />shouldn’t a deal be a deal. He stated that the City of Mounds View has given the Community a <br />beautiful golf course that provides people with the opportunity to enjoy the amenities and meet <br />new people, which is a precious experience that cannot be taken away from anyone. He stated <br />that if a deal has been made they should stay with it noting that they are on the right track with <br />Clear Channel. <br /> <br />Ray Ramirez, 2273 Irondale Rd, asked if a survey regarding the golf course would be distributed <br />to the residents in Mounds View. He stated that he is in favor of the golf course and expressed <br />concerns that many of the people speaking in support of the golf course tonight are from other <br />areas. He stated that he would like the residents of Mounds View to have the opportunity to <br />discuss the issues further and agreed that it is a beautiful sport for children. <br /> <br />Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road stated that it would be helpful if the City offered the <br />Community more information. He stated that they do not have to mitigate the wetlands in <br />Mounds View as it can be mitigated in any Watershed district they want to as long as they meet <br />the mitigation requirements. He referenced the survey stating that one has already been done by <br />Decision Resources and in the survey, it is the same number of people who said ‘sell’ that are the <br />same who also say ‘if it isn’t costing, keep it’. He stated that he would like to see a solid number <br />from Ehlers and Associates that projects the value of the golf course, along side comparisons of <br />what would happen if the land were TIF’d and the actual value of the land. He asked if they are <br />jumping too soon to divest themselves of this asset noting that land is going up in valued and <br />would continue to escalate in value. He stated that he would like to know what the professionals <br />would say the value of the land would be by the time the golf course has paid off its’ obligations <br />and also at what point do they think the citizens would question what was decided here. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.