Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View EDA July 25, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br />the EDA has the option to look at de-certification or consider a continuance. He stated that if <br />they continue the TIF District 3 there should be projects that are looked at within that district. He <br />stated that they could not hoard the dollars and they cannot have dollars coming in and not spend <br />it for the purpose it was intended, which is economic development. He explained that in terms of <br />this particular district it is a healthy district noting that they get well over $300,000 a year in <br />increment payments. He stated that it is primarily derived by SYSCO, some derived by ZEP and <br />some derived by Bridges Leasing, but the majority is derived by SYSCO. He stated that they <br />have had some discussions with Ehlers about doing a complete analysis of all of the districts but <br />the initial review is that they are fairly close to the original figure of approximately $1 million. <br /> <br />Vice President Stigney stated that he would like to see it in black and white as to where the City <br />is at and what the priorities are for the expenditures of the funds as to whether it would be put <br />back and paying the down the tax base or keep the Districts going. He stated that there is a need <br />for further discussion noting that they now have SYSCO asking for money and eventually <br />Snyder’s would be coming in to ask for the same thing. He expressed concerns about the <br />amounts being spent. He stated that he wants the details and the big picture of the project. He <br />stated that he has problems with the amounts and has problems with mitigating offsite. He <br />expressed concerns about the removal of the trees to make way for the parking lot adding that he <br />would like to see a joint meeting with Council and Staff to determine the philosophy and <br />direction on TIF for all of the districts. <br /> <br />President Marty agreed with Vice President Stigney. <br /> <br />Director Ericson agreed stating that this is what Staff is planning to do noting that if they can get <br />the information prepared and presented from Ehlers for the September work session. He stated <br />that this would be the perfect opportunity to discuss the philosophy, the health of the TIF <br />districts, whether the City would de-certify or are they going to fund other projects and at what <br />level. He stated that these are all issues that should be discussed with the EDA, the City Council <br />and Staff. He stated that this should be on the September or October work session agenda. He <br />stated that Staff would have a plan for the future but also need to know where they are today. He <br />stated that in terms of cash on hand, Economic Development Coordinator Backman indicated <br />that the City would have approximately $1 million in the TIF account this year adding that what <br />is being proposed would not be out of the TIF pool, but rather an ongoing obligation similar to <br />the original SYSCO agreement, which is a pay as you go note. He stated that it would not impact <br />the account as to what is on hand adding that Staff recognizes and appreciates the comments <br />from the EDA. <br /> <br />Vice President Stigney stated that it would impact the taxpayers noting that the City either <br />extends the district and pay as you go or close the district. He stated that he has concerns noting <br />that the public hearing is scheduled for August 8, 2005 and he would like the information prior to <br />the public hearing. He suggested rescheduling the public hearing in order to give them the <br />opportunity to review all of the information. He stated that this is bigger than just looking at this