Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View EDA October 24, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br />Commissioner Flaherty stated per the previous discussion related to the compost site, he would <br />like to wait until the EDA sees an alternative to relocate the compost site before authorizing the <br />delineation study. He stated he would like to have the developers, City staff, and Ramsey County <br />come up with an alternative to the compost site prior to moving ahead with a delineation. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman explained that this information would be useful <br />for the whole area, about 40 acres, and would not address a specific concept plan. This <br />information will pertain to the location of the wetlands. He explained that as with the Hidden <br />Hollow soil borings, the delineation will get information to determine if the soils are appropriate <br />for development. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman pointed out that the weather is starting to change <br />so the “window” to do delineations is coming to a close. If the delineation is done over the <br />winter, the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) will look at that information differently. He <br />stated the delineation will indicate where the wetland area is located and encouraged the EDA to <br />consider this request. In addition it would provide guidance to the developer since if the wetland <br />is larger, it will impact where the homes, development, and roads are located. <br /> <br />Commissioner Thomas noted the concept plan presented tonight is not a final plan and a <br />delineation plan would be beneficial for the City to know what can be done with the concept <br />plan. She stated the plan reviewed tonight can be workable and the EDA’s goals are to work <br />with this property. She stated she is comfortable with considering this action tonight. <br /> <br />Commissioner Gunn stated her agreement. <br /> <br />Commissioner Flaherty asked how long is the delineation information good. Economic <br />Development Coordinator Backman indicated three years. <br /> <br />Barbara Haake, 3024 County Road I, stated she is a member of the RCWD, which spent $95,000 <br />to look at the Greenfield Park area. To save money, she suggested City staff approach the <br />RCWD to get their engineering information which was done in the last two years. She advised <br />that the RCWD will also do this kind of work without a high charge. <br /> <br />President Marty suggested staff contact the RCWD to see if they have reviewed that area. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman advised a hydrology report was done by Peterson <br />Environmental in 2000 but too much time has elapsed to use that information. <br /> <br />Ms. Hart stated she and Mr. Sweitzer met with the RCWD and learned they did not have <br />information on this property. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Thomas/Gunn. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 05-EDA-210