My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-23-2006
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
01-23-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 9:05:54 AM
Creation date
8/3/2018 8:54:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
1/23/2006
Commission Doc Number (Ord & Res)
0
Supplemental fields
Date
1/23/2006
EDA Document Type
Council Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View EDA January 23, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman indicated that the project costs for Medtronic, as <br />they are currently configured, total over $125 million, including $65.5 million for building <br />construction, $11 million for land acquisition costs in Mounds View, $24 million for other <br />development costs, such as parking, land acquisition in Blaine, etc., and $25 million for <br />computers, lab equipment and furnishings. That is $125 million of investment that Medtronic is <br />making. The total also excludes $21+ million in State appropriations for the reconstruction of <br />County Road J and replacement of the bridge over I-35W necessary to provide adequate access to <br />the campus. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman advised that the new Medtronic CRM campus is <br />beginning to be recognized as one of Minnesota’s most important economic development <br />projects. Recently, the national site selection magazine, Business Facilities, announced that <br />Medtronic’s project in Mounds View received the top economic development award in its <br />category for expansion projects in the United States. He noted they will be coming to Minnesota <br />to award the City a plaque, recognizing that this is a significant project. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman reviewed that on November 28, 2005, the <br />Mounds View City Council directed staff to proceed with discussions with Medtronic regarding <br />the potential acceleration of Phase 2 construction of the campus. On December 12, 2005, the <br />City Council approved setting a public hearing for February 13, 2006 to discuss modification of <br />the TIF plan and the business subsidy necessary for acceleration of Phase 2 to be concurrent with <br />Phase 1. On January 9, 2006, the Mounds View EDA ranked replacement of Well #4 as the <br />highest priority for City infrastructure needs, followed by payment from Medtronic to the City’s <br />roadway fund. Also, the EDC adopted a motion last Friday unanimously recommending <br />approval of the terms of the amended agreement. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman explained that by combining Phase 1 and 2, the <br />initial phase of the project would be significantly increased. The number of employees would be <br />increased from approximately 3,000 to over 4,300. The building complex would be increased <br />from 820,000 square feet to 1.2 million square feet. He noted that the Minimum Assessment <br />Agreement would increase accordingly to $96 million. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman advised that Medtronic has requested 95% of the <br />available tax increment from the entire development (Phases 1 and 2), the same percentage that <br />was used in the current agreement. The available TIF increment for the revised project would be <br />$22.9 million. Thus, by combining the two phases, the TIF note issued by the Authority would <br />increase by $8.1 million. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman stated that Medtronic would continue to finance <br />their development costs up front and would receive tax increment on a pay-as-you-go basis at the <br />same interest rate as discussed in the first agreement. Under the amended contract, fiscal <br />disparities would continue to be paid inside the district, the same as agreed with the original <br />agreement. The length of the TIF district would remain the same at 25 years. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman explained that in return for TIF assistance, the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.