My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-10-2006
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
EDA
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
07-10-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2018 8:56:15 AM
Creation date
8/3/2018 8:56:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV EDA
EDA Document Type
Council Minutes
Date
1/10/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mounds View EDA July 10, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> <br />A. Review the Mounds View Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Policy 46 <br /> 47 <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained that the issue was requested for additional 48 <br />consideration. He said the EDA asked the Planning Commission about scenarios regarding 49 <br />increment being generated through the life of the three TIF districts. He stated it was requested 50 <br />that the City’s TIF policy be compared to the St. Anthony Village’s policy. 51 <br /> 52 <br />Director Ericson gave an update regarding Planning Commission’s discussion on the subject. He 53 <br />stated there was no consensus from the Planning Commission about what should be done. He 54 <br />said they were not able to present any recommendation about whether the TIF increment should 55 <br />be supported as-is or changed. 56 <br /> 57 <br />Director Ericson stated the original three TIF districts run through 2015 and the increment will 58 <br />no longer be available after that time. Hs stated the question is whether to maximize the 59 <br />increment through the remaining years of the TIF districts, which is the status quo, or whether to 60 <br />change the TIF districts. 61 <br /> 62 <br />Commissioner Gunn arrived at 6:25 p.m. 63 <br /> 64 <br />Director Ericson said the Planning Commission felt they were not in the position to make a 65 <br />recommendation at this time. He said they agreed with the Economic Development Commission 66 <br />that County Road 10 and City streets are the priority. He said they were not sure how much 67 <br />money would be available and how much spending funds in one area would decrease funding for 68 <br />another area. 69 <br /> 70 <br />Director Ericson stated that the Planning Commission also considered at scenarios that the EDA 71 <br />discussed and there was an additional item of discussion: the impact on the median-value home 72 <br />in Mounds View. 73 <br /> 74 <br />Director Ericson stated that the concern is that because the dollars were presented in a 2006 75 <br />figure, without any inflation or estimation of property values over time, a recommendation based 76 <br />on static figures will not be correct because it will not be the reality in 2015. He stated the 77 <br />Planning Commission suggested spending some increment on the corridor, but are not making a 78 <br />recommendation nor are they explicitly supporting the status quo. 79 <br /> 80 <br />Director Ericson stated that both the Mounds View’s and St. Anthony’s TIF policies are 81 <br />presented. He stated they are both structured the same, but St. Anthony’s goes into more detail. 82 <br />He stated the EDA could review the TIF policy and make amendments and changes. He stated at 83 <br />this point it is being brought back for additional EDA discussion. 84 <br /> 85 <br />Director Ericson reminded the EDA of their previous vote supporting the status quo. 86 <br /> 87
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.