My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-10-2006
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
07-10-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 9:07:03 AM
Creation date
8/3/2018 8:56:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
1/10/2006
Commission Doc Number (Ord & Res)
0
Supplemental fields
Date
1/10/2006
EDA Document Type
Council Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View EDA July 10, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br />there is not enough money for all of the projects regardless and the City needs to scrutinize 172 <br />projects and determine priorities. 173 <br /> 174 <br />Acting President Stigney stated he has some problems with the applications for the TIF money. 175 <br />He stated he would like the Planning Commission’s priority list for specific projects. 176 <br /> 177 <br />Commissioner Thomas stated she favors Scenario B because it is not just an issue. She stated it 178 <br />is a move the City can make to put properties back on the tax rolls and to send the message that 179 <br />Mounds View will give assistance but that will be over once the businesses are on their feet. She 180 <br />stated it is a larger issue than the $32 refund. She added that the money belongs to the taxpayers 181 <br />and it makes the City responsible. 182 <br /> 183 <br />Commissioner Thomas stated that TIF funds are easy for the City to spend and the City needs to 184 <br />make a symbolic measure to remind the community and Council about whose money it is. She 185 <br />stated the City should not be asking for the money. She added that she likes projects that are 186 <br />visible, not ones the citizens do not see because the City does not ask specifically for the funds. 187 <br /> 188 <br />Commissioner Flaherty stated there are better ways to make symbolic moves. He stated he likes 189 <br />Mounds View’s body of work, but likes the way Saint Anthony’s policy flows. He stated Saint 190 <br />Anthony’s policy is concise, precise, and strong. He stated that Mounds View has a policy, but it 191 <br />could be formatted better. 192 <br /> 193 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman stated he was at the Planning Commission 194 <br />meeting on July 5th. He said there was some suggestion that the five scenarios did not have the 195 <br />validity if there was not the factor of inflation. He stated he does believe the scenarios are fair 196 <br />because the same assumptions were made throughout. 197 <br /> 198 <br />Coordinator Backman stated if there is a desire for Staff to analyze how the policy is written, the 199 <br />EDC would be willing to compare the policies and would even be willing to review those of 200 <br />other cities. He stated the language could be refined. 201 <br /> 202 <br />Acting President Stigney stated he would like the summary from Saint Anthony’s policy 203 <br />incorporated and suggested it be run by the EDC. 204 <br /> 205 <br />Ken Glidden, 5240 Edgewood Drive, stated he has been at several of the TIF discussions. He 206 <br />stated the discussions are confusing because the issues of the policy and plan are not kept 207 <br />separate. He said he does not want to deal much with existing districts. 208 <br /> 209 <br />Mr. Glidden stated he agrees that if there was clear-cut criteria established with the districts, 210 <br />there would not be the discussions about when and what to do. He stated that he does not believe 211 <br />the TIF policies are precise or clear enough. 212 <br /> 213
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.