My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-22-2010
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
EDA
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
11-22-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2018 10:22:18 AM
Creation date
8/3/2018 10:22:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV EDA
EDA Document Type
Council Minutes
Date
11/22/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mounds View EDA November 8, 2010 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />Economic Development Specialist Steinmetz reviewed with the EDA the proposed changes to <br />the Loan Program Criteria. She indicated the EDA has been discussing this item for several <br />months and the most recent draft has a summary of changes highlighted in yellow. An asset limit <br />was written in to Loan Option 4, which was recommended by the GMHC staff. Staff <br />recommends approval of the draft home improvement loan program criteria. If approved staff <br />would discuss administrative under writing fees with GMHC in further detail and would bring <br />forward an agreement to the EDA. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mueller asked if the demolition loan was for 10 years, or if it was due upon sale <br />of the property. She recommended these statements within the criteria be conjoined so as not to <br />appear there is an option. <br /> <br />Vice President Stigney questioned if the EDA should have greater knowledge of the GMHC fees <br />prior to advertising this loan program. Economic Development Specialist Steinmetz indicated <br />she would not begin marketing the program if the EDA advised. <br /> <br />Vice President Stigney asked how loans would be handled if defaulted on by a resident. <br />Economic Development Specialist Steinmetz indicated the City could potentially be out the <br />money. <br /> <br />Vice President Stigney questioned what action the City could take and if the City had no options, <br />he had a problem with the criteria in this program. Economic Development Specialist Steinmetz <br />indicated the City would be second in line to be paid if a home were to be foreclosed. <br /> <br />President Flaherty asked if the City had the right to put a lien on the property. Community <br />Development Director Roberts stated the loan was a lien. He indicated if the property were to <br />sell, the lien would be paid, but if foreclosed it potentially would be negated. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hull questioned how this type of program worked in other cities. Economic <br />Development Specialist Steinmetz stated all were written in the same manner and these loans <br />were never paid back first, prior to a home mortgage. She explained the City would be at a slight <br />risk with these loans. <br /> <br />Vice President Stigney wondered if a City loan could be tacked on to property taxes if defaulted. <br /> Economic Development Specialist Steinmetz was uncertain if this was an option. <br /> <br />Vice President Stigney requested that GMHC fees be waived if a loan within the City were <br />defaulted. Economic Development Specialist Steinmetz indicated she would investigate this <br />further with GMHC. <br /> <br />Vice President Stigney stated the general home loan should be rewritten to ensure that this loan
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.