Laserfiche WebLink
M:\MasterFiles\1999 thru 2010\2000\EDA\EDA Packets\03-13-00\Item No. 05A,05B,05C--Aaron Parrish.doc <br />Item No. 5A - 5C <br />Staff Report No. <br />Meeting Date: 3-13-00 <br />Type of Business: EDA <br />WK: Work Session; PH: Public Hearing; <br />CA: Consent Agenda; CB: Council Business <br /> <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: EDA President and Commissioners <br />From: Aaron Parrish, Economic Development Coordinator <br />Item Title/Subject: Economic Development Commission Direction <br />Date of Report: March 13, 2000 <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />At the February 24th meeting of the Economic Development Commission, Commission Members <br />expressed an interest in conducting business retention visits and addressing potential options for 2901 <br />Highway 10. <br /> <br />Business Retention Visits <br /> <br />Last month the EDC developed a work plan (available on the following page) to guide their activities in the <br />proceeding year. Recognizing the importance of business retention in Mounds View, one particular <br />component of the work plan calls for the Commission to “Participate with staff in retention calls to local <br />businesses.” Accordingly, the Commission respectfully requests direction/authorization from the EDA to <br />develop a Business Retention Visit Program. <br /> <br />2901 Highway 10 <br /> <br />Informally, the EDC inquired about potential options available for the redevelopment of 2901 Highway 10, <br />or the former Kunz Oil property. At this point, there appears to be three preliminary options including <br />purchase of the site, active code enforcement, and demolition assistance. Direction is requested to <br />further investigate the aforementioned options for the site. <br /> <br />Tax Abatement Policy <br /> <br />In 1997, local units of government were given the authority to grant property tax abatements. In essence, <br />tax abatement allows local units of government (city, county, school district) discretion in abating their <br />portion of property taxes. In comparison to TIF, abatement is project specific whereas TIF is district <br />dependent. Unlike TIF, there are no restrictions on how or where abatement proceeds may be spent. <br /> <br />The above information is offered to provide context. There are many additional facets of abatement that <br />have yet to be enumerated. However, direction is sought for the EDC to examine the potential use of tax <br />abatement in Mounds View, and if necessary to develop a tax abatement policy. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Provide direction to the EDC regarding business retention visits, 2901 Highway 10, and tax abatement. <br /> <br /> <br />____________________________ <br />Aaron Parrish <br />Economic Development Coordinator