My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-12-2015
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
01-12-2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 9:14:33 AM
Creation date
8/6/2018 6:16:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
1/12/2015
Commission Doc Number (Ord & Res)
0
Supplemental fields
Date
1/12/2015
EDA Document Type
Council Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View EDA October 13, 2014 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> <br />Executive Director Ericson stated the CDBG grant funds would expire at the end of 2014. 1 <br /> 2 <br />President Flaherty discussed the benefits of the grant program noting it would allow the home 3 <br />with a burnt garage removed and replaced with a new home. He did not understand why the 4 <br />homeowners had not chosen to sell the home on the open market. He provided comment on the 5 <br />other properties the City has tried to purchase through CDBG funds. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Mr. Ackerman believed that there was no need to demolish the home, as it could be 8 <br />reconstructed. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Ms. Ackerman encouraged the Council to reconsider the request and questioned if the grant 11 <br />funds should be used on another property. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Commissioner Meehlhause commented that this was not up to the City to determine. He 14 <br />explained that the EDA was simply acting on the request of the homeowner. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Mr. Ackerman went on record stating he and his wife objected to the proposed purchase and 17 <br />demolition of the property at 2665 Ardan Avenue. He requested the EDA delay the proposed 18 <br />project. 19 <br /> 20 <br />President Flaherty asked if the EDA could delay the project. He believed the EDA had a small 21 <br />window of opportunity for this project. He apologized to the Ackerman’s for the short notice on 22 <br />this project. Planning Associate Heller indicated the City had a purchase agreement in place with 23 <br />the homeowner. Executive Director Ericson stated there would be a risk in delaying the project 24 <br />as a purchase agreement was in place and could be withdrawn by the seller and the funds would 25 <br />go back to the County. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Commissioner Hull feared that if the EDA did not take action on the property, that it would sit on 28 <br />the open market for another year or two and no action would be taken. He explained that the 29 <br />City was trying to help the neighborhood by improving the property. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Commissioner Gunn reiterated the fact that the homeowners came to the City and offered their 32 <br />property for the CDBG grant program. She explained that the City did not force the property 33 <br />owner into this sale. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Mr. Ackerman had a problem with homeowners handing their property over to the government 36 <br />for sale. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Commissioner Meehlhause asked if this item could be delayed to October 27th, to allow the 39 <br />Ackerman’s to speak with their neighbors, and still allow the City to complete the purchase of 40 <br />the property, if necessary. Executive Director Ericson stated he had a meeting with GMHC next 41 <br />week. He stated the reality was that a delay could have the entire project falling apart. 42
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.